Rosler v. Saul
| Brian Rosler |
| Andrew M. Saul |
| Social Security Administration |
| 3:2021cv00815 |
| June 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Sarah A L Merriam |
| Stefan R Underhill |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #11 Consent Motion for Extension of Time until October 15, 2021 to file the Certified Administrative Record. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 08/13/2021. (Powell, G.)
|
| Filing 11 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time until October 15, 2021 to File the Certified Administrative Record by Andrew M. Saul. (Attachments: #1 8-10-21 Declaration)(Fitzhugh, Nicol) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicol Fitzhugh on behalf of Andrew M. Saul (Fitzhugh, Nicol) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER OF TRANSFER. Absent consent to a Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Judge Stefan R. Underhill for all further proceedings. Signed by Clerk on 7/22/2021.(Anastasio, F.)
|
|
Filing 8
REMINDER: STANDING ORDER ON SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 6/30/2021. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Anastasio, F.)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Julia C. Walker on behalf of Andrew M. Saul (Walker, Julia) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER re: request to issue summons. Counsel for plaintiff has requested that the Clerk issue a summons to the Commissioner of Social Security. That request is denied, as moot. As the Standing Scheduling Order indicates, a summons is not necessary: "Service of Complaint. In lieu of service of process of the Complaint and related documents, the Clerk of the Court shall provide service via the Court's CM/ECF system to the Commissioner of Social Security by electronically serving it on the Social Security Administration's Office of the General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office for the District of Connecticut. If this process is followed, the Defendant has agreed that it will constitute adequate service of process." Doc. #3 at 2. The Complaint was in fact served on the Commissioner in this manner on June 16, 2021, and a copy of the Complaint was emailed to the relevant offices. Counsel is once again advised to review the Standing Order to ensure familiarity with its provisions. See Dahlberg v. Saul, No. 3:21CV00447(MPS), Doc. #9 (D. Conn. Apr. 1, 2021). It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 6/17/2021. (Katz, S.)
|
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 06/16/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING SCHEDULING ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 06/16/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER ON SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 06/16/2021. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Fazekas, J.)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE by Brian Rosler re #1 Complaint civil cover sheet (Insler, Lewis) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-6546523.), filed by Brian Rosler.(Insler, Lewis) |
| Answer deadline updated for Andrew M. Saul to 8/16/2021. (Fazekas, J.) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Andrew M. Saul. (Insler, Lewis) |
| Judge Stefan R. Underhill and Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam added. (Nuzzi, Tiffany) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
