McKeon v. Saul
Plaintiff: Vanessa McKeon
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 3:2021cv00816
Filed: June 16, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Sarah A L Merriam
Referring Judge: Jeffrey A Meyer
2 Judge: Stefan R Underhill
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER granting #13 Motion for Extension of Time to file certified administrative record Defendant's record shall be filed by October 15, 2021; plaintiffs motion to reverse or remand by December 15, 2021; and for defendant's cross-motion to affirm by February 1, 2022. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 8/12/21. (Barry, Donna)
August 12, 2021 Set Deadline: Defendant's cross-motion to affirm due by 2/1/2022 (Barry, Donna)
August 10, 2021 Filing 13 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time until October 15, 2021for Filing the Certified Administrative Record by Andrew M. Saul. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Declaration of Jebby Rasputnis, Office of Appellate Operations SSA)(Stewart, Sean)
August 9, 2021 Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Sean Stewart on behalf of Andrew M. Saul (Stewart, Sean)
July 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER. The Commissioner shall file its answer and the administrative record on or before August 16, 2021. The Court further orders the Commissioner to produce a text-searchable version of the record on the same date as the certified record. This "searchable record" should contain identical images to the certified record as well as the certified record's table of contents and electronic tabs but need not be certified or comply with the PDF/A standard. This "searchable record" shall be understood as a supplemental submission to aid the Court and parties' review of the record, rather than a substitute for the certified record required by 42 U.S.C. 405(g); if there are conflicts, the certified record shall govern. Plaintiff shall file a Motion to Reverse and/or Remand and supporting memorandum of law on or before November 22, 2021. The memorandum of law must explain the reasons why plaintiff believes the decision should be reversed or remanded for reconsideration, specifically addressing whether there was an error of law or a lack of substantial evidence to support the decision below. See, e.g., Greek v. Colvin, 802 F.3d 370, 374-75 (2d Cir. 2015) (per curiam). The Commissioner shall file its response or its Motion to Affirm the decision of the Commissioner on or before January 19, 2022. Plaintiff may file a reply brief within 14 days of the Commissioner's response. The parties should file briefing with appropriate citations to the record but are excused from any requirement to file a separate material statement of facts. Counsel should confer at the earliest practicable time if there will be an agreement to a voluntary remand and to filing of a joint motion for voluntary remand in lieu of full rounds of briefing. The Court will contact the parties shortly after filing of the Commissioner's response regarding a date for scheduling of oral argument. The parties are advised that the Court is unlikely to grant an extension of time of the dates as set forth in this scheduling order, and that failure to comply with the Court's scheduling order may result in a summary grant of relief for the opposing party. Any motion for extension of time must be filed at least 5 days in advance of the deadline that is due and must establish "good cause" with a particularized showing why the existing deadline could not be reasonably met despite the diligence of the party seeking an extension of time in accordance with the requirements of D. Conn. Local Civ. R. 7(b). It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 7/23/21.(Barry, Donna)
July 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 7/22/21.(Barry, Donna)
July 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER OF TRANSFER. Absent consent to a Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer for all further proceedings. Signed by Clerk on 7/22/2021.(Anastasio, F.)
June 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 REMINDER: STANDING ORDER ON SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 6/30/2021. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Anastasio, F.)
June 29, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Julia C. Walker on behalf of Andrew M. Saul (Walker, Julia)
June 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff has filed a motion seeking to proceed without payment of fees and costs, which includes a sworn statement as to plaintiff's current financial circumstances. See Docs. #2 , #2 -1. Plaintiff is not employed, and asserts that her spouse's income does not cover the family's monthly obligations. See Doc. #2 -1 at 3-4. Plaintiff reports that she and her spouse own a home, on which they owe a mortgage, as well as two vehicles, but have minimal cash on hand. See id. at 4. At this stage, such allegations are sufficient to establish that plaintiff is unable to pay the ordinary filing fees required by the Court. 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. It is so ordered.Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 6/16/2021. (Weis, Anne)
June 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 06/16/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
June 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STANDING SCHEDULING ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 06/16/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
June 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING ORDER ON SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 06/16/2021. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Fazekas, J.)
June 16, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Vanessa McKeon. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Yelner, Olia)
June 16, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul, Social Security Administration, filed by Vanessa McKeon.(Yelner, Olia)
June 16, 2021 Answer deadline updated for Andrew M. Saul to 8/16/2021. (Fazekas, J.)
June 16, 2021 Judge Stefan R. Underhill and Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam added. Motions referred to Sarah A. L. Merriam (Oliver, T.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McKeon v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Represented By: Julia C. Walker
Represented By: Sean Stewart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Vanessa McKeon
Represented By: Olia Yelner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?