Imperato v. Saul
Plaintiff: Erma Imperato
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 3:2021cv00896
Filed: June 30, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Sarah A L Merriam
Referring Judge: Stefan R Underhill
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Answer deadline updated for Andrew Saul to 10/29/2021. (Caffrey, A.)
August 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #6 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Certified Administrative Record. The Commissioner shall file the Administrative Transcript on or before October 29, 2021. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 8/25/2021. (Weis, Anne)
August 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 REMINDER: STANDING ORDER ON SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 8/25/2021. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Anastasio, F.)
August 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time until October 29, 2021 to File the Certified Record by Andrew Saul. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Declaration of Jebby Rasputnis, Office of Appellate Operations)(Stewart, Sean)
August 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Sean Stewart on behalf of Andrew Saul (Stewart, Sean)
June 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Answer deadline updated for Andrew Saul to 8/30/2021. (Fazekas, J.)
June 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 06/30/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
June 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING SCHEDULING ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 06/30/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
June 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 STANDING ORDER ON SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 06/30/2021. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Fazekas, J.)
June 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul, filed by Erma Imperato. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Letter)(Fazekas, J.)
June 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing fee received from Frand and Erma Imperato: $402.00, receipt number CTXH00018143. (Fazekas, J.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Imperato v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Erma Imperato
Represented By: Russell D. Zimberlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Represented By: Sean Stewart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?