Phillips v. Kijakazi
| Anastasia Phillips |
| Kilolo Kijakazi |
| Social Security Administration |
| 3:2021cv01019 |
| July 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Kari A Dooley |
| Sarah A L Merriam |
| Stefan R Underhill |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 dc |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time. The Certified Administrative Record shall be filed on or before October 25, 2021. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 9/20/2021. (Banker, Joshua)
|
| Filing 9 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time until October 25, 2021 to File the Certified Administrative Record by Kilolo Kijakazi. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jebby Rasputnis)(Stewart, Sean) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Sean Stewart on behalf of Kilolo Kijakazi (Stewart, Sean) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER OF TRANSFER. Case reassigned to Judge Kari A. Dooley, who presided over related case: 3:19-cv-01081-KAD Philips v. Saul, for all further proceedings. Signed by Clerk on 8/3/2021.(Anastasio, F.)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff has filed a motion seeking to proceed without payment of fees and costs, which motion includes a sworn statement as to plaintiff's current financial circumstances. See Doc. #2 -1. Plaintiff has completed the required information. Plaintiff asserts that she has $16,000 in her checking account, which is "mostly from a payment from SSA." Id. at 4. Plaintiff's counsel further explains this is from a "recently received... lump-sum payment representing past-due Disabled-Adult Child Benefits[]" and "is earmarked for [plaintiff's] current and future living expenses, as well as the two student loans she has been attempting to repay." Doc. #2 at 1. At this time, plaintiff's only resources come from what counsel represents are past-due benefits. Presumably, had those benefits been properly paid, plaintiff would have spent those benefits in due course to cover her monthly obligations. See Doc. #2 -1 at 4-5. Plaintiff also has significant student loan debt, see Doc. #2 at 1, and receives "Husky Insurance[.]" Doc. #2 -1 at 3. At this stage, such allegations are sufficient to establish that plaintiff is unable to pay the ordinary filing fees required by the Court. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 7/30/2021. (Katz, S.)
|
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 07/26/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING SCHEDULING ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 07/26/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER ON SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 07/26/2021. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Fazekas, J.)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Anastasia Phillips. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Yelner, Olia) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kilolo Kijakazi, Social Security Administration, filed by Anastasia Phillips.(Yelner, Olia) |
| Answer deadline updated for Kilolo Kijakazi to 9/24/2021. (Fazekas, J.) |
| Judge Stefan R. Underhill and Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam added. Motions referred to Sarah A. L. Merriam(Walker, J.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
