Gress v. DeJoy
Plaintiff: Edmund Arthur Gress
Defendant: Louis DeJoy
Case Number: 3:2021cv01066
Filed: August 4, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Kari A Dooley
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS REISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Louis DeJoy* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Edmund Arthur Gress* *6C Cohasset Lane* *Madison, CT 06443*. (Freberg, B)
September 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Louis DeJoy* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Edmund Arthur Gress* *6C Cohasset Lane* *Madison, CT 06443*. (Freberg, B)
September 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Louis DeJoy. (Freberg, B)
September 3, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER denying without prejudice #2 Motion to Appoint Counsel. A plaintiff in a civil case is not entitled to appointment of counsel on request and the Second Circuit repeatedly cautions against the routine appointment of counsel. See, e.g., Hendricks v. Coughlin, 114 F.3d 390, 393 (2d Cir. 1997); Cooper v. A. Sargenti Co., 877 F.2d 170, 172 (2d Cir. 1989). Insofar as volunteer lawyer time is not always readily available, a plaintiff seeking appointment of counsel must show first that he "sought counsel and has been unable to obtain it." McDonald v. Head Criminal Court Supervisor Officer, 850 F.2d 121, 123 (2d Cir. 1988). Once a plaintiff has made this showing, he must then demonstrate that his complaint passes the test of "likely merit." Cooper, 877 F.2d at 173. He must demonstrate that the claims in the complaint have a sufficient basis to justify appointing a volunteer lawyer to pursue them. Notably, "[e]ven where the claim is not frivolous, counsel is often unwarranted where the [plaintiff's] chances of success are extremely slim." Id. at 171 (quotation marks and citation omitted). Here, even accepting the Plaintiff's representations that he has sought and been unable to obtain counsel, the Court cannot ascertain from the complaint alone whether the Plaintiff's claims have likely merit. The motion is therefore denied without prejudice to renewal at a subsequent stage of the litigation. See, e.g., Gray v. Licon-Vitale, No. 3:19-CV-1291 (MPS), 2019 WL 5901546, at *4 (D. Conn. Nov. 12, 2019) (denying motion for appointment of counsel where "[t]he current record, consisting only of the complaint which will likely be amended soon, is insufficient to determine whether the plaintiff's claims possess likely merit" and concluding in these circumstances that "appointment of counsel is premature."). Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 9/3/2021. (Cahill, Leslie)
August 9, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #5 Protective Order, #1 Complaint filed by Edmund Arthur Gress, #4 Electronic Filing Order, #6 Notice, #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Edmund Arthur Gress Signed by Clerk on 8/9/2021.(Freberg, B)
August 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE re Initial Discovery Protocols. Signed by Clerk on 8/4/2021. (Attachments: #1 Discovery Attachment)(Freberg, B)
August 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 8/4/2021.(Freberg, B)
August 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 8/4/2021.(Freberg, B)
August 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 10/3/2021; Discovery due by 2/3/2022; Dispositive Motions due by 3/10/2022. Signed by Clerk on 8/4/2021.(Freberg, B)
August 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Edmund Arthur Gress. (Freberg, B)
August 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Louis DeJoy, filed by Edmund Arthur Gress. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits part 1, #2 Exhibits part 2, #3 Exhibits part 3, #4 Exhibits part 4)(Freberg, B)
August 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing fee received from Edmund Gress: $ 402, manual receipt number 783533. (Freberg, B) Modified on 8/9/2021 to add receipt number (Freberg, B).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gress v. DeJoy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Edmund Arthur Gress
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Louis DeJoy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?