Tedesco v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Maristane Tedesco |
Midland Credit Management, Inc. |
3:2021cv01151 |
August 27, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Michael P Shea |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Answer deadline updated for Midland Credit Management, Inc. to 10/29/2021. (Johnson, D.) |
Filing 10 ORDER. The motion (ECF No. #9 ) for extension of time is GRANTED. The defendant's responsive pleading is due October 29, 2021.Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 10/1/2021. (Wong, Qing Wai) |
Filing 9 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time until October 29, 2021to File Responsive Pleading by Midland Credit Management, Inc.. (Fredericks, Aaron) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Aaron Arthur Fredericks on behalf of Midland Credit Management, Inc. (Fredericks, Aaron) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Maristane Tedesco. Midland Credit Management, Inc. served on 9/10/2021, answer due 10/1/2021. (Lemberg, Sergei) |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Midland Credit Management, Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Sergei Lemberg* *Lemberg Law, LLC* *43 Danbury Road* *Wilton, CT 06897*. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #1 Complaint filed by Maristane Tedesco, #3 Electronic Filing Order, #4 Protective Order, #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines Signed by Clerk on 08/30/2021. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 4 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 08/27/2021. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 08/27/2021. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 10/26/2021. Discovery due by 2/26/2022. Dispositive Motions due by 4/2/2022. Signed by Clerk on 08/27/2021. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Midland Credit Management, Inc. ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-6627163.), filed by Maristane Tedesco. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lemberg, Sergei) |
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Midland Credit Management, Inc.. (Lemberg, Sergei) |
Judge Michael P. Shea added. (Anastasio, F.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Tedesco v. Midland Credit Management, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Maristane Tedesco | |
Represented By: | Sergei Lemberg |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Midland Credit Management, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Aaron Arthur Fredericks |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.