USA v. $58,070.00 in United States Currency et al
| USA |
| $58,070.00 in United States Currency |
| Garfield Thomas |
| 3:2021cv01175 |
| September 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Michael P Shea |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property |
| 21 U.S.C. ยง 881 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 First ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Garfield Thomas.(Conway, Glenn) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Glenn Mead Conway on behalf of Garfield Thomas Claimant (Conway, Glenn) |
| Filing 5 WARRANT of Arrest in Rem issued. (Freberg, B) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #1 Complaint filed by USA, #2 Electronic Filing Order, #3 Standing Protective Order Signed by Clerk on 09/2/2021.(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 3
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 09/2/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 2
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 09/2/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against $58,070.00 in United States Currency, filed by USA.(Nelson, David) |
| Judge Michael P. Shea added. (Anastasio, F.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
