Gould v. Barone et al
| Jeffrey P. Gould |
| Kristine K. Barone and Angel Quiros |
| 3:2021cv01237 |
| September 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Victor A Bolden |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. § 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 23
ORDER granting #22 Motion for Extension of Time. Respondents shall file a response to Petitioner's #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by December 10, 2021. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 11/08/2021. (Castano, Nelson)
|
| Filing 22 MOTION for Extension of Time until December 10, 2021 to respond to 9 Order to Show Cause, by Kristine K. Barone, Angel Quiros. (Proto, Michael) |
| Filing 21 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael J. Proto on behalf of Kristine K. Barone, Angel Quiros (Proto, Michael) |
|
Filing 20
ORDER denying #11 Motion to Seal. Petitioner's #11 Motion to Seal is denied. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 10/26/2021. (Castano, Nelson)
|
| Filing 19 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jeffrey P. Gould. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(Imbriani, Susan) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Addition of Prayer for Relief by Jeffrey P. Gould re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Attachments: #1 envelope)(Imbriani, Susan) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER denying #3 Motion to Appoint Counsel. The Court denies Petitioner's motion to appoint counsel without prejudice. Petitioner may refile their motion when a response has been filed to the petition for writ of habeas corpus. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 10/08/2021. (Castano, Nelson)
|
| Filing fee received from Jeffrey Gould: $5.00, receipt number CTXB00012476. (Fazekas, J.) |
| Filing 16 DECLARATION ADDENDUM to #3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel Signed By Jeffrey P. Gould filed by Jeffrey P. Gould. (Payton, R.) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER denying #13 Motion to transfer case to U.S. District Court in Hartford Conn. The court denies Plaintiff's request to transfer the case to the district court in Hartford. As a general matter, cases filed in this district are randomly assigned to the Hartford, New Haven, or Bridgeport divisions. A case can be properly tried in Bridgeport if it has been filed in the District of Connecticut. See Tucker v. American Intern. Group, Inc., 728 F. Supp. 2d 114, 127 n.29 (D. Conn. 2010) ("Cases filed in the District of Connecticut are randomly assigned to the three divisions of Hartford, New Haven and Bridgeport. Neither plaintiff nor the defendants can therefore claim improper venue in Bridgeport where they have both asserted that Connecticut is the proper venue and the case could have been assigned to any one of the three locations."); see also Melillo v. Brais, 3:17-CV-00520 (KMT), 2017 WL 2462822, at *4 (D. Conn. June 7, 2017) ("The District of Connecticut only has three seats of court - Bridgeport, New Haven, and Hartford - and all of these locations would require Plaintiffs to commute from their home[.]").Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 10/04/2021. (Castano, Nelson)
|
| Filing 15 Memorandum in Support re #3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Jeffrey P. Gould. (Payton, R.) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Compliance by Jeffrey P. Gould re 10 Order re: Insufficiency, (Payton, R.) |
| Docket Entry Correction re #13 LETTER/ MOTION to transfer case to U.S. District Court in Hartford Conn. modified to correct filer. (Payton, R.) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Seal Designated Material by Jeffrey P. Gould. (Payton, R.) |
| Filing 13 LETTER/ MOTION to transfer case to U.S. District Court in Hartford Conn. by Jeffrey P. Gould 10/20/2021 (Payton, R.) Modified on 10/1/2021 to correct filer .(Payton, R.). |
| Filing 10 Notice to petitioner re: Insufficiency. You must submit the filing fee of $5.00 or the attached IFP application sent to you via U.S. Mail. If insufficiency not corrected Dismissal due by 10/14/2021 Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 9/23/21.(Payton, R.) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER. It is hereby ORDERED that the Respondent file a response on or before November 10, 2021 why the relief prayed for in the #1 petition for writ of habeas corpus should not be granted, and it is ORDERED that the Clerk of Court serve a copy of this order and a copy of the petition and all attachments to Amy Bepko by e-mail on or before September 30, 2021. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 9/22/2021. (Castano, Nelson)
|
| Filing 8 EXHIBITS by Jeffrey P. Gould re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit)(Imbriani, Susan) |
| Filing 7 EXHIBITS by Jeffrey P. Gould re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit)(Imbriani, Susan) |
|
Filing 6
STANDING ORDER ON PRISONER ELECTRONIC FILING PROGRAM Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 09/17/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 5
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 09/17/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 09/17/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
| Filing 3 PRISCS - MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Jeffrey P. Gould. (Fazekas, J.) |
| Filing 2 PRISCS - Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Jeffrey P. Gould. (Fazekas, J.) |
| Filing 1 PRISCS - PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Jeffrey P. Gould. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter)(Fazekas, J.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
