McDonald v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Brian McDonald
Defendant: Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 3:2021cv01239
Filed: September 17, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Sarah A L Merriam
Referring Judge: Robert A Richardson
2 Judge: Stefan R Underhill
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 15, 2021 Filing 12 Social Security Transcripts. (Fitzhugh, Nicol)
November 15, 2021 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicol Fitzhugh on behalf of Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (Fitzhugh, Nicol)
October 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: The plaintiff has paid the filing fee in this case. In light of this payment the #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and 3 Recommended Ruling are denied as moot. Signed by Judge Robert A. Richardson on 10/4/2021. (Fries, J.)
September 27, 2021 Filing fee received from Brian McDonald: $ 402.00, receipt number CTXN00023872 (Pesta, J.) Modified on 9/28/2021 to add receipt number (Carr, Dave).
September 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Robert A. Richardson on 9/22/21.(Blue, A.)
September 22, 2021 Filing 8 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Brian McDonald. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Robert A. Richardson. This matter has been transferred to a magistrate judge. All non-efiled submissions should be filed at the seat of court where the magistrate judge presides. The case number will remain the same, but must be followed by the magistrate judge's initials. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 9/22/2021.(Anastasio, F.)
September 21, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE by Brian McDonald Consent to Magistrate Judge (Dunn, Jennifer)
September 20, 2021 Filing 3 RECOMMENDED RULING. The Court recommends that plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis be DENIED. Plaintiff has filed a motion seeking to proceed without payment of fees and costs, which motion includes a sworn statement as to plaintiff's current financial circumstances. See Doc. #2 . In pertinent part, plaintiff attests that he has $8,000 total in his checking and savings accounts. See id. at 4. It thus appears that plaintiff has sufficient cash on hand to pay the $400 filing fee. 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1) allows a court to authorize commencement of an action without prepayment of fees only when "the person is unable to pay such fees or give security therefor." 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1) (emphasis added). The allegations in plaintiff's affidavit are insufficient to establish plaintiff's inability to pay the ordinary filing fees required by the Court. See id. Indeed, based on the statements in the affidavit, plaintiff may be in the unenviable position of "having to weigh the financial constraints posed if he pursues [this action] against the merits of his case." Wrenn v. Sec'y of Health & Hum. Servs., No. 86CV00916, 1987 WL 47383, at *1 (N.D.N.Y. June 18, 1987), aff'd sub nom. Wrenn v. Bowen 854 F.2d 1315 (2d Cir. 1988). Accordingly, the Court recommends that plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis be DENIED. If plaintiff wishes to pursue this matter, he must pay the required filing fee on or before October 4, 2021.This is a recommended ruling. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(1). Any objections to this recommended ruling must be filed with the Clerk of the Court within fourteen (14) days after the filing of this ruling. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2).Plaintiff receives notice electronically. Accordingly, any objection must be filed on or before October 4, 2021. Failure to file an objection within this time frame will preclude appellate review. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Rules 72, 6(a) and 6(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 72.2(a); Small v. Secretary of H.H.S., 892 F.2d 15 (2d Cir. 1989) (per curiam); F.D.I.C. v. Hillcrest Assoc., 66 F.3d 566, 569 (2d Cir. 1995). Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 9/20/2021. (Katz, S.)
September 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 09/17/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
September 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 STANDING SCHEDULING ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 09/17/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
September 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STANDING ORDER ON SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 09/17/2021. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Fazekas, J.)
September 17, 2021 Answer deadline updated for Commissioner of the Social Security Administration to 11/16/2021. (Fazekas, J.)
September 17, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Brian McDonald. (Anastasio, F.)
September 17, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, filed by Brian McDonald. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Application to Proceed IFP)(Dunn, Jennifer) Modified on 9/17/2021 to correct parties (Anastasio, F.).
September 17, 2021 Judge Stefan R. Underhill and Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam added. Motions referred to Sarah A. L. Merriam(Anastasio, F.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McDonald v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brian McDonald
Represented By: Jennifer Latstetter Dunn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Represented By: Nicol Fitzhugh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?