Britton v. Rodriguez et al
Terrell Britton |
Rodriguez, Cartagena, Pearson, Harris, Jane Doe and John Doe |
3:2021cv01257 |
September 21, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Vanessa L Bryant |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Set deadline: filing fee due by 11-22-2021 per Dkt. 13 Order. (Shafer, J.) |
|
Filing 11 MOTION for Reconsideration re #9 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Terrell Britton. (Carr, Dave) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Reconsideration re #9 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Terrell Britton. (Carr, Dave) |
|
Filing 8 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Terrell Britton. (Payton, R.) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Terrell Britton. (Payton, R.) |
Filing 6 Notice to petitioner re: Insufficiency #2 Ledger Sheet. You must submit a Ledger Sheet showing the past six months transactions. If insufficiency not corrected Dismissal due by 10/20/2021 Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 9/29/21.(Payton, R.) |
|
|
|
Filing 2 PRISCS - MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Terrell Britton. (Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 1 PRISCS - COMPLAINT against Cartagena, Jane Doe, John Doe, Harris, Pearson, Rodriguez, filed by Terrell Britton.(Fazekas, J.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.