Begin v. Becton, Dickinson & Co
| Dylan Begin |
| Becton, Dickinson & Co |
| 3:2021cv01329 |
| October 7, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Victor A Bolden |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
SCHEDULING ORDER: Following the parties' Rule 26(f) submissions, and based on the Court's preferences, the Court adopts the following pre-trial schedule:- Initial disclosures due by January 14, 2022. - Joinder of parties due by December 17, 2021 (Plaintiff) and January 21, 2022 (Defendant). - Amended pleadings due by December 17, 2021 (Plaintiff) and responses due by January 21, 2022 (Defendant).- Damages analysis due by May 6, 2022. - Designation of expert witnesses due by June 3, 2022 (Plaintiff) and August 5, 2022 (Defendant). - Depositions of expert witnesses due by July 1, 2022 (Plaintiff) and September 2, 2022 (Defendant).- Fact depositions shall be completed by September 2, 2022. - Expert discovery and all discovery shall close by September 2, 2022. - Dispositive motions due by November 4, 2022. - Joint trial memorandum is due by October 21, 2022, or 30 days after the Court rules on any dispositive motion. - Trial ready date is December 5, 2022, or within 30 days of the filing of the joint trial memorandum.If, after the close of discovery, the parties wish to meet with a Magistrate Judge to discuss settlement, the parties may jointly file such a request by September 8, 2022. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 11/23/2021. (Lee, Diana)
|
|
Filing 14
REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Cardin, Kelly)
|
|
Filing 13
ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Becton, Dickinson & Co.(Cardin, Kelly)
|
|
Answer deadline updated for Becton, Dickinson & Co to 11/15/2021. (Perez, J.)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint until November 15, 2021. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 10/08/2021. (Lee, Diana)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #3 Notice of Statement Pursuant to the Standing Order on Removed Cases filed by Becton, Dickinson & Co, #4 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Becton, Dickinson & Co, #2 Notice of No Pending Motions filed by Becton, Dickinson & Co, #5 Notice of Appearance filed by Nicole S. Mule on behalf of Becton, Dickinson & Co, #8 Electronic Filing Order, #10 Notice Re: Initial Discovery Protocols, #7 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #1 Notice of Removal filed by Becton, Dickinson & Co, #9 Standing Protective Order, #6 MOTION for Extension of Time until November 15, 2021 to Respond Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Becton, Dickinson & Co Signed by Clerk on 10/8/2021. (Attachments: #1 Removal Standing Order)(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Set Deadlines: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 11/22/2021 (Perez, J.)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE RE: INITIAL DISCOVERY PROTOCOLS Signed by Clerk on 10/7/2021. (Attachments: #1 Initial Discovery Protocols Attachment)(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 9
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 10/7/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 8
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 10/7/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 7
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 12/6/2021. Discovery due by 4/8/2022. Dispositive Motions due by 5/13/2022. Signed by Clerk on 10/7/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION for Extension of Time until November 15, 2021 to Respond Plaintiff's Complaint by Becton, Dickinson & Co. (Mule, Nicole)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Appearance by Nicole S. Mule on behalf of Becton Dickinson & Company (Mule, Nicole)
|
|
Filing 4
Corporate Disclosure Statement by Becton Dickinson & Company. (Cardin, Kelly)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE by Becton Dickinson & Company of Statement Pursuant to the Standing Order on Removed Cases (Cardin, Kelly)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE by Becton Dickinson & Company of No Pending Motions (Cardin, Kelly)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Becton Dickinson & Company from Connecticut Superior Court, case number NNH-CV21-6117213-S. Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACTDC-6676945, filed by Becton Dickinson & Company.(Cardin, Kelly)
|
|
Judge Victor A. Bolden added. (Walker, J.)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Begin v. Becton, Dickinson & Co | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Dylan Begin | |
| Represented By: | James V. Sabatini |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Becton, Dickinson & Co | |
| Represented By: | Kelly Marie Cardin |
| Represented By: | Nicole S. Mule |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
