McLennon v. Stork
| Keith T McLennon and Keith McLennon |
| Viktoryia Stork |
| 3:2021cv01337 |
| October 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Jeffrey A Meyer |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
REPLY to Response to #14 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint filed by Keith McLennon. (Pesta, J.)
|
|
Filing 16
REPLY to Response to #14 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint filed by Viktoryia Stork. (Mayer, Edward)
|
|
Filing 15
OBJECTION re #14 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint filed by Keith McLennon. (Carr, Dave)
|
|
Filing 14
MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint by Viktoryia Stork.Responses due by 11/26/2021 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Notice to Pro Se Litigant)(Mayer, Edward)
|
|
Filing 12
OBJECTION re #8 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Keith McLennon. (Carr, Dave)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER. The Court GRANTS plaintiff's motion for leave to file an amended complaint (Doc. #11 ) and accepts for filing plaintiff's amended complaint (Doc. #9 ). In light of the filing of the amended complaint, the Court DENIES as moot defendant's motion to dismiss (Doc. #8 ) and without prejudice to filing of any motion to dismiss as to the amended complaint within 21 days. It is so ordered.Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 10/27/21. (Barry, Donna)
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION to Amend #9 Amended Complaint by Keith McLennon.Responses due by 11/16/2021 (Carr, Dave)
|
|
Filing 10
OBJECTION re #8 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Keith McLennon. (Carr, Dave)
|
|
Filing 9
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Viktoryia Stork, filed by Keith McLennon.(Carr, Dave)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION to Dismiss by Viktoryia Stork.Responses due by 11/5/2021 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Notice to Pro Se Litigant)(Mayer, Edward)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Viktoryia Stork, #2 Notice of Appearance filed by Viktoryia Stork, #3 Notice of Appearance filed by Viktoryia Stork, #6 Protective Order, #4 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #5 Electronic Filing Order Signed by Clerk on 10/12/2021. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order)(Carr, Dave)
|
|
Filing 6
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 10/8/2021.(Carr, Dave)
|
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 10/8/2021.(Carr, Dave)
|
|
Filing 4
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 12/7/2021 Discovery due by 4/9/2022 Dispositive Motions due by 5/14/2022 Signed by Clerk on 10/8/2021.(Carr, Dave)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas John Plumridge on behalf of Viktoryia Stork (Plumridge, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Appearance by Edward W. Mayer, Jr on behalf of Viktoryia Stork (Mayer, Edward)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Viktoryia Stork from Hartford Superior Court, case number HHD-CV-21-5069579-S. Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACTDC-6678816, filed by Viktoryia Stork. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Mayer, Edward)
|
|
Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer added. (Anastasio, F.)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
