Lapan v. USA et al
| Harvey Lapan |
| USA, Merrick B. Garland, U.S. Attorney General and Respondent Superior |
| 3:2021cv01400 |
| October 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Victor A Bolden |
| Robert A Richardson |
| Drug Related Seizure of Property |
| 21 U.S.C. § 881 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Robert A. Richardson including #17 MOTION request status update re 9 Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 12/15/2021.Motions referred to Judge Robert A. Richardson(Perez, J.)
|
| Filing 17 MOTION to request status update re 9 Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge, by Harvey Lapan.Responses due by 1/3/2022 (Imbriani, Susan) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER denying #3 Motion to Appoint Counsel; denying #4 Motion for Order; denying #5 Motion for Order; denying #12 Motion for Exemption from electronic filing; denying #12 Motion to Appoint Counsel; denying #13 Motion to Appoint Counsel; denying #14 Motion to Amend/Correct. Plaintiff's motions are denied without prejudice to renewal at a later date, after resolution of Plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 12/02/2021. (Castano, Nelson)
|
| Filing 15 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Harvey Lapan re #14 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint, #13 MOTION to Appoint Counsel (Attachments: #1 envelope)(Imbriani, Susan) |
| Filing 14 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint by Harvey Lapan.Responses due by 12/20/2021 (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(Imbriani, Susan) |
| Filing 13 RENEWED MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Harvey Lapan. (Imbriani, Susan) |
| Filing 12 MOTION for Exemption from electronic filing, Renewed MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Harvey Lapan. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(Imbriani, Susan) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE by Merrick B. Garland, Respondent Superior, U.S. Attorney General, USA (Nelson, David) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by David Christopher Nelson on behalf of Merrick B. Garland, Respondent Superior, U.S. Attorney General, USA (Nelson, David) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Robert A. Richardson for #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and for initial review of the Complaint #1 pursuant to 28 USC 1915. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 10/25/2021.Motions referred to Robert A. Richardson(Perez, J.)
|
|
Filing 8
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 10/21/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 7
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 10/21/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 6
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 12/20/2021. Discovery due by 4/22/2022. Dispositive Motions due by 5/27/2022. Signed by Clerk on 10/21/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Appoint Court's Expert Asset Appraiser by Harvey Lapan. (Fazekas, J.) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Alternative Service of Complaint and Summons by Harvey Lapan. (Fazekas, J.) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Harvey Lapan. (Fazekas, J.) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Harvey Lapan. (Fazekas, J.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Merrick B. Garland, Respondent Superior, U.S. Attorney General, USA, filed by Harvey Lapan. (Attachments: #1 Witness Affidavit, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope)(Fazekas, J.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
