Wade v. Commissioner of Social Security
Andre Wade |
Kilolo Kijakazi and Commissioner of Social Security |
Social Security Administration |
3:2021cv01405 |
October 21, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Thomas O Farrish |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 dc |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Commissioner of Social Security, Andre Wade. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas O. Farrish. This matter has been transferred to a magistrate judge. All non-efiled submissions should be filed at the seat of court where the magistrate judge presides. The case number will remain the same, but must be followed by the magistrate judge's initials. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 12/15/2021.(Anastasio, F.) |
Filing 9 NOTICE by Andre Wade Consent to Magistrate (Ramos, Ivan) |
Filing 8 SCHEDULING ORDER: The Government having filed its administrative record (Doc. No. 6), the court hereby enters the following Scheduling Order: Plaintiff shall file a motion to reverse and/or remand, supporting memorandum of law, and statement of material facts on or before February 7, 2022. Defendant shall file a motion to affirm or a motion for voluntary remand, supporting memorandum of law, and statement of material facts on or before April 8, 2022. Plaintiff may file a reply brief pursuant to Local Rule 7(d) on or before April 22, 2022. Prior to the filing of any dispositive motions, counsel are encouraged to confer regarding the merits of the case in an effort to determine whether a reversal and voluntary remand are appropriate. The court reminds the parties of the previously filed Standing Scheduling Order which sets forth page limits and form and content requirements for motions, supporting memoranda, and statement of materials facts. (Doc. No. 3) The parties should avoid boilerplate discussions of the governing legal standards as the court is familiar with the standard of review and the sequential evaluation process employed in the analysis of Social Security disability applications. The parties should focus on informing the court of relevant and controlling legal authority and applying it to the facts of this case. Motions filed by the parties must comply with the requirements set forth above and in the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Failure to comply may result in denial of the motion. Requests for extensions of these deadlines are discouraged and, unless unusual circumstances dictate otherwise, counsel should not seek an extension of greater than 30 days. Any motion for extension of a deadline must include a showing of good cause as required by Local Rule 7(b)(2) and must be filed at least three days before the existing deadline. Dispositive Motions due by 2/7/2022 Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 12/10/21. (Caldero, M.) |
Filing 7 REMINDER: Standing Order on Social Security Appeals Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 12/9/2021. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Anastasio, F.) |
Filing 6 Social Security Transcripts. (McKimens, Pam) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Pam McKimens on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (McKimens, Pam) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 10/21/2021.(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 3 STANDING SCHEDULING ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 10/21/2021.(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 2 STANDING ORDER ON SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 10/21/2021. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Fazekas, J.) |
Answer deadline updated for Commissioner of Social Security to 12/20/2021. (Fazekas, J.) |
Judge Stefan R. Underhill and Judge Thomas O. Farrish added. (Anastasio, F.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kilolo Kijakazi ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-6693955.), filed by Andre Wade. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Appeals Council Permission to File a Civil Action)(Ramos, Ivan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.