Rivera v. Brooks
| Frank Rivera |
| Thomas V. Brooks |
| 3:2021cv01441 |
| October 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Victor A Bolden |
| S Dave Vatti |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Motion to Withdraw. Based on the #7 Motion to Withdraw, the Court dismisses this case without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) ("[T]he plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing [ ] a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment."). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case.The Court, sua sponte, notes for the record its concern that Mr. Rivera's #7 Motion to Withdraw is identical, both in substance and handwriting, to that filed in a different case by another individual residing at the same state facility. The Court also notes for the record its concern that both Mr. Rivera and the other plaintiff's Complaints indicate that an unspecified source told them that they may receive $150 from the defendants in their respective cases. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 11/17/2021. (Castano, Nelson)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Withdraw #1 Complaint by Frank Rivera. (Imbriani, Susan) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/16/2021: #1 envelope) (Imbriani, Susan). |
|
Filing 6
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge S. Dave Vatti including #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and for initial review of the Complaint #1 pursuant to 28 USC 1915. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 11/3/2021.Motions referred to Judge S. Dave Vatti(Perez, J.)
|
|
Filing 5
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 10/29/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 10/29/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 3
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 12/28/2021. Discovery due by 4/30/2022. Dispositive Motions due by 6/4/2022. Signed by Clerk on 10/29/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Frank Rivera. (Fazekas, J.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Thomas V. Brooks, filed by Frank Rivera. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Fazekas, J.) Modified on 11/1/2021 to correct file date(Fazekas, J.). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rivera v. Brooks | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Frank Rivera | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Thomas V. Brooks | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
