Goode v. Williams et al
| Jason Goode |
| Charles Williams, Roger Bowles, Antonio Santiago, R. Harnett, John Crooms, Rumela Jesnec, Darren Chevalier, Kidd and Pamela Jesnec |
| 3:2021cv01463 |
| November 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Michael P Shea |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER. The plaintiff seeks reconsideration of the ruling denying his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis stating the court provided no reason for denying the motion. In the ruling, ECF No. #11 , the court clearly stated that the plaintiff provided financial information showing he had a spendable balance in his inmate account of $654.57, more than enough to pay the $402.00 filing fee. The motion for reconsideration is denied. The Clerk is directed to send the plaintiff another copy of ECF No. #11 (the text order and the accompanying document). Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 12/8/2021. (Wong, Qing Wai)
|
| Filing 12 Objection and MOTION for Reconsideration re #11 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jason Goode. (Hushin, Z.) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER. The plaintiff's #2 motion to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. The Court notes that the complaint will be deemed received by the court on November 1, 2021, so long as the filing fee is submitted within the time allotted by this order. Accordingly, all further proceedings in the matter shall be held in abeyance for thirty (30) days pending the plaintiff's delivery of the filing fee in the amount of $402.00 (money order or bank check made payable to the Clerk of Court) to the Clerks Office, 915 Lafayette Blvd., Bridgeport, Connecticut, 06604. Failure to tender the filing fee within thirty days of this order will result in the dismissal of this action.Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 11/29/2021. (Wong, Qing Wai)
|
| Filing 10 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Jason Goode. (Payton, R.) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Compliance by Jason Goode (Payton, R.) |
| Filing 8 DECLARATION in support of #3 MOTION for ADA Reasonable Accommodation By Jason Goode (Pesta, J.) |
| Filing 7 Notice to petitioner re: Insufficiency #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. You must submit the attached Prisoner's IFP application sent to you via U.S. mail. Also, you must submit a ledger sheet showing the past six months' transactions. If insufficiency not corrected Dismissal due by 11/26/2021 Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 11/5/2021.(Payton, R.) |
|
Filing 6
STANDING ORDER ON PRISONER ELECTRONIC FILING PROGRAM Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 11/1/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 5
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 11/1/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 11/1/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
| Filing 3 PRISCS - MOTION for ADA Reasonable Accommodation by Jason Goode. (Fazekas, J.) Modified on 11/2/2021 to add prefix (Fazekas, J.). |
| Filing 2 PRISCS - MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jason Goode. (Fazekas, J.) |
| Filing 1 PRISCS - COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Jason Goode. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter)(Fazekas, J.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
