Jean-Baptiste v. Froehlich et al
| Oles Jean-Baptiste |
| Ryan Froehlich, Norwich City, City of Norwich Police Department, Matthew Seidel, Elizabeth Harsley, Benjamin Sawary, James V. Mastroian, Matthew Goddu and Harrison Formiglo |
| 3:2021cv01482 |
| November 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Sarah A L Merriam |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 11/5/2021.(Freberg, B)
|
|
Filing 6
E-Filing Standing Order on Prisoner Electronic Filing Program. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 11/5/2021.(Freberg, B)
|
|
Filing 5
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 11/5/2021.(Freberg, B)
|
| Filing 4 PRISCS - MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Oles Jean-Baptiste. (Freberg, B) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Oles Jean-Baptiste. (Freberg, B) |
| Filing 2 PRISCS - MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Oles Jean-Baptiste. (Freberg, B) |
| Filing 1 PRISCS - COMPLAINT against Ryan Froehlich, Norwich City, City of Norwich Police Department, Matthew Seidel, filed by Oles Jean-Baptiste.(Freberg, B) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
