Cosby v. Bucior
Plaintiff: Howard W. Cosby
Defendant: Bucior
Case Number: 3:2021cv01491
Filed: November 8, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Kari A Dooley
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Bucior* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. *Howard W. Cosby # 233397* *MACDOUGALL-WALKER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION* *1153 East Street South* *Suffield, CT 06080*. (Fanelle, N.)
December 8, 2021 Opinion or Order USM 285 forms together with Summons, Complaint, Order granting IFP, IRO, Standing Order Re: Discovery reviewed and brought to the USM Office in Bridgeport for service on defendant Bucior. Marshals Return of Service on Summons due by 12/28/2021. (Fanelle, N.)
December 8, 2021 Opinion or Order REQUEST FOR WAIVER of Service sent to Officer Bucior on 12/8/2021 by Howard W. Cosby. Waiver of Service due by 1/12/2022. (Fanelle, N.)
December 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Standing Order Re: Initial Discovery Disclosures Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 12/1/2021. (Fanelle, N.)
November 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 INITIAL REVIEW ORDER Discovery due by 6/30/2022; Dispositive Motions due by 7/30/2022. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 11/30/2021. See attached Order. (Gould, K.)
November 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. If you change your address at any time during the litigation of this case, Local Rule 83.1(c)2 provides that you notify the court. Failure to do so can result in the dismissal of your case. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 11/22/21. (Payton, R.)
November 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 11/8/2021. (Oliver, T.)
November 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Prisoner E-Filing Standing Order on Prisoner Electronic Filing Program Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 11/8/2021. (Oliver, T.)
November 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 11/8/2021. (Oliver, T.)
November 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 PRISCS - Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Howard W. Cosby. (Oliver, T.)
November 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 PRISCS - Prisoner Authorization Form by Howard W. Cosby. (Oliver, T.)
November 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 PRISCS - MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Howard W. Cosby. (Oliver, T.)
November 8, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PRISCS - COMPLAINT against Bucior, filed by Howard W. Cosby.(Oliver, T.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cosby v. Bucior
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Howard W. Cosby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bucior
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?