Duhaime v. Decopac, Inc.
| Diane Duhaime |
| Decopac, Inc. |
| 3:2021cv01492 |
| November 8, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Charles S Haight |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Answer deadline updated for Decopac, Inc. to 1/20/2022. (Reis, Julia) |
Filing 9
ELECTRONIC ORDER. Defendant's #8 Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED, absent objection and for good cause shown. Defendant shall respond to Plaintiff's #1 Complaint on or before January 20, 2022. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr. on December 20, 2021. (Mattison, N.)
|
| Filing 8 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time until January 20, 2022 to Answer, Move or otherwise Respond to the Complaint #1 Complaint by Decopac, Inc.. (Hay, John) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by John J. Hay on behalf of Decopac, Inc. (Hay, John) |
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons, Complaint etc. served on Decopac, Inc. on 11/30/21, filed by Diane Duhaime. (Leviton, Jason) |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Decopac, Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Jason M. Leviton* *Block & Leviton LLP* *260 Franklin Street, Ste 1860* *Boston, MA 02110*. (Gutierrez, Y.) |
|
Filing 4
NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #1 Complaint filed by Diane Duhaime, #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #3 Electronic Filing Order. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr on 11/8/2021.(Gutierrez, Y.)
|
|
Filing 3
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr on 11/8/2021.(Gutierrez, Y.)
|
|
Filing 2
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 1/7/2022; Discovery due by 5/10/2022; Dispositive Motions due by 6/14/2022. Signed by Clerk on 11/8/2021.(Gutierrez, Y.)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Decopac, Inc. ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-6714689.), filed by Diane Duhaime. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Leviton, Jason) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Decopac, Inc.. (Leviton, Jason) |
| Judge Charles S. Haight, Jr added. (Hushin, Z.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Duhaime v. Decopac, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Diane Duhaime | |
| Represented By: | Jason M. Leviton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Decopac, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | John J. Hay |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
