Cerame et al v. Bowler et al
Plaintiff: Mario Cerame and Timothy C. Moynahan
Defendant: Michael P. Bowler and Matthew G. Berger
Case Number: 3:2021cv01502
Filed: November 10, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Alvin W Thompson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 4, 2022 Set/Reset Deadlines as to #14 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Responses due by 2/17/2022. (Ferguson, L.)
January 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER: The Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response (ECF No. #15 ) is hereby GRANTED. The plaintiffs shall file a response to the defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. #14 ) by 2/17/2022. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 1/4/2022. (Milov-Cordoba, M.)
January 3, 2022 Filing 15 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #14 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction until February 17, 2022 by Mario Cerame, Timothy C. Moynahan. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Samp, Richard)
December 28, 2021 Filing 14 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Matthew G. Berger, Michael P. Bowler.Responses due by 1/18/2022 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss)(Skold, Michael)
December 28, 2021 Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Emily Adams Gait on behalf of Matthew G. Berger, Michael P. Bowler (Gait, Emily)
December 28, 2021 Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Skold on behalf of Matthew G. Berger, Michael P. Bowler (Skold, Michael)
December 2, 2021 Filing 11 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Matthew G. Berger, Michael P. Bowler* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Richard Samp* *New Civil Liberties Alliance* *1225 19th Street, Suite 450, 20036* *Washington, DC 22207*. (Agati, Kathryn)
December 1, 2021 Request for Clerk to issue summons as to All Defendants. (Samp, Richard)
November 16, 2021 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard Samp on behalf of Timothy C. Moynahan (Samp, Richard)
November 16, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard Samp on behalf of Mario Cerame (Samp, Richard)
November 12, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Margaret A. Little on behalf of Mario Cerame, Timothy C. Moynahan (Little, Margaret)
November 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 MOTION for Attorney Richard Samp to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Clerk on 11/12/2021. (Peterson, M)
November 10, 2021 Filing 6 MOTION for Attorney(s) Richard Samp to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-6718946) by Mario Cerame, Timothy C. Moynahan. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Little, Margaret)
November 10, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #4 Protective Order, #1 Complaint filed by Timothy C. Moynahan, Mario Cerame, #3 Electronic Filing Order Signed by Clerk on 11/10/2021. (Peterson, M)
November 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 11/10/2021. (Peterson, M)
November 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 11/10/2021. (Peterson, M)
November 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 1/9/2022. Discovery due by 5/12/2022. Dispositive Motions due by 6/16/2022. Signed by Clerk on 11/10/2021. (Peterson, M)
November 10, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-6718036.), filed by Mario Cerame, Timothy C. Moynahan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Little, Margaret)
November 10, 2021 Judge Alvin W. Thompson added. (Oliver, T.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cerame et al v. Bowler et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mario Cerame
Represented By: Margaret A. Little
Represented By: Richard Samp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Timothy C. Moynahan
Represented By: Margaret A. Little
Represented By: Richard Samp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael P. Bowler
Represented By: Emily Adams Gait
Represented By: Michael Skold
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Matthew G. Berger
Represented By: Emily Adams Gait
Represented By: Michael Skold
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?