Miller v. Hartford
| Chris-Ann Miller |
| City of Hartford and CHRO |
| 3:2021cv01535 |
| November 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Kari A Dooley |
| Robert M Spector |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER adopting #8 Recommended Ruling. The Court has reviewed the Recommended Ruling concerning #1 the Complaint. Plaintiff did not file an objection to the Recommended Ruling by December 12, 2021, nor did the Plaintiff file an amended complaint by December 14, 2021. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). The Recommended Ruling contains an accurate statement of the applicable law and a thoroughly reasoned analysis and application of that law to the circumstances presented here. The Recommended Ruling therefore is Accepted, Adopted and So Ordered. Accordingly, Plaintiffs claim for age discrimination is dismissed with prejudice. The remaining claims are dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 12/15/2021. (Gould, K.)
|
| Filing 8 RECOMMENDED RULING: For the reasons stated in the attached Recommended Ruling, the Court respectfully recommends that the plaintiff's claim for age discrimination (see Doc. No. #1 ) be dismissed with prejudice, that the plaintiff's claim for race, national origin and disability discrimination be dismissed without prejudice, and that the plaintiff be afforded an opportunity to file an amended complaint by December 14, 2021 in which she shall set forth her allegations of race, national origin and disability discrimination with sufficient particularity and precisely identify the named defendants(s). Any amended complaint must comply with the Federal and Local Rules of Civil Procedure. The amended complaint must be captioned "Amended Complaint" and will completely supersede the current Complaint. 9 Pages. Objections due by 12/7/2021 Signed by Judge Robert M. Spector on 11/23/2021.(Watson, M.) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (See Doc. No. 8). Signed by Judge Robert M. Spector on 11/23/2021. (Watson, M.)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Robert M. Spector for ruling on motion including #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and review of the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 11/18/2021.Motion referred to Robert M. Spector.(Gould, K.)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE RE: INITIAL DISCOVERY PROTOCOLS Signed by Clerk on 11/17/2021. (Attachments: #1 Initial Discovery Protocols Attachment)(Fazekas, J.) |
| Filing 5 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Clerk on 11/17/2021.(Fazekas, J.) |
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 11/17/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 3
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 1/16/2022. Discovery due by 5/19/2022. Dispositive Motions due by 6/23/2022. Signed by Clerk on 11/17/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Chris-Ann Miller. (Fazekas, J.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of Hartford, filed by Chris-Ann Miller. (Attachments: #1 EEOC Letter)(Fazekas, J.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
