Cascio v. Brooks Brown, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Thomas Cascio
Defendant: Brooks Brown, LLC doing business as Driveway Doctor and Brooks S Brown doing business as Scott Brown
Case Number: 3:2021cv01645
Filed: December 12, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey A Meyer
Nature of Suit: Contract Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 19, 2022 Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand by Brooks Brown, LLC, Brooks S Brown.(Noonan, Thomas)
January 19, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas B. Noonan on behalf of Brooks Brown, LLC, Brooks S Brown (Noonan, Thomas)
January 2, 2022 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Thomas Cascio (Katz, Michael)
December 15, 2021 Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Brooks Brown, LLC, Brooks S Brown* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Michael Katz* *107 Cherry Street* *Katonah, NY 10536*. (Walker, J.)
December 15, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #3 Electronic Filing Order, #4 Protective Order, #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #1 Complaint filed by Thomas Cascio Signed by Clerk on 12/15/2021.(Walker, J.)
December 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 12/12/2021.(Walker, J.)
December 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 12/12/2021.(Walker, J.)
December 12, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 2/10/2022 Discovery due by 6/13/2022 Dispositive Motions due by 7/18/2022 Signed by Clerk on 12/12/2021.(Walker, J.)
December 12, 2021 Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer added. (Anastasio, F.)
December 12, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-6754887.), filed by Thomas Cascio. (Attachments: #1 Civil cover sheet)(Katz, Michael)
December 12, 2021 Request for Clerk to issue summons as to All Defendants. (Katz, Michael)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cascio v. Brooks Brown, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thomas Cascio
Represented By: Michael Katz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brooks Brown, LLC doing business as Driveway Doctor
Represented By: Thomas B. Noonan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brooks S Brown doing business as Scott Brown
Represented By: Thomas B. Noonan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?