Kresge et al v. Greenberg
Plaintiff: David Kresge and Snaplok Systems LLC
Defendant: Nathan Greenberg
Case Number: 3:2021cv01707
Filed: December 23, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Janet C Hall
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 18, 2022 Filing 9 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Nathan Greenberg* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Timothy Andrew Johnson* *Getz Balich LLC* *10 Waterside Drive Suite 205* *Farmington, CT 06032*. (Freberg, B)
February 18, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Christine K. Bush on behalf of Nathan Greenberg (Bush, Christine)
February 17, 2022 Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Nathan Greenberg. (Johnson, Timothy)
December 27, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #1 Complaint, filed by David Kresge, Snaplok Systems LLC, #4 Protective Order, #3 Electronic Filing Order, #5 Order, #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines Signed by Clerk on 12/27/21.(Pesta, J.)
December 23, 2021 Filing 6 AO 120 Report on the Filing of an Action re: Patent or Trademark Form Completed (Attachments: #1 copy of complaint) (Pesta, J.)
December 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 DISCOVERY STANDING ORDER Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 12/23/21.(Pesta, J.)
December 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 12/23/21.(Pesta, J.)
December 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 12/23/21.(Pesta, J.)
December 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 2/21/2022 Discovery due by 6/24/2022 Dispositive Motions due by 7/29/2022 Signed by Clerk on 12/23/21.(Pesta, J.)
December 23, 2021 Judge Janet C. Hall added. (Anastasio, F.)
December 23, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nathan Greenberg ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-6769964.), filed by David Kresge, Snaplok Systems LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E)(Johnson, Timothy)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kresge et al v. Greenberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Kresge
Represented By: Timothy Andrew Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Snaplok Systems LLC
Represented By: Timothy Andrew Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nathan Greenberg
Represented By: Christine K. Bush
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?