Brooks-Bey et al v. Raytheon Technologies Corporation et al
| Tarrique Brooks-Bey and Wadner Brizeus |
| Raytheon Technologies Corporation, Pratt & Whitney Division, Quest Global Services NA, Inc., Belcan LLC, Cyient Inc., Parametric Solutions, Inc., Agilis Engineering, Inc., Mahesh Patel, Robert Harvey, Harpreet Wasan, Steve Houghtaling, Gary Prus, Frank O'Neill, Co-Conspirator 2, Co-Conspirator 4, Does 1-50, Thomas Edwards and Co-Conspirator |
| 3:2021cv01723 |
| December 28, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Sarala V Nagala |
| Anti-Trust |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 CERTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING re #11 MOTION for Attorney(s) Anjalee M. Behti to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-6789025) by Wadner Brizeus, Tarrique Brooks-Bey. (Behti, Anjalee) |
| Filing 20 CERTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING re #10 MOTION for Attorney(s) Heather T. Rankie to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-6788993) by Wadner Brizeus, Tarrique Brooks-Bey. (Rankie, Heather) |
| Filing 19 CERTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING re #9 MOTION for Attorney(s) Christopher T. Micheletti to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-6788932) by Wadner Brizeus, Tarrique Brooks-Bey. (Micheletti, Christopher) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE of Appearance by Anjalee Meren Behti on behalf of Wadner Brizeus, Tarrique Brooks-Bey (Behti, Anjalee) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by Heather T. Rankie on behalf of Wadner Brizeus, Tarrique Brooks-Bey (Rankie, Heather) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher Micheletti on behalf of Wadner Brizeus, Tarrique Brooks-Bey (Micheletti, Christopher) |
| Cases associated. Create association to 3:21-cv-01657-SVN. (Imbriani, Susan) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by James T. Shearin on behalf of Agilis Engineering, Inc., Frank O'Neill (Shearin, James) |
Filing 14
ORDER granting #11 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Anjalee M. Behti, Esq. Certificate of Good Standing due by 3/14/2022. Signed by Clerk on 1/13/2022. (Imbriani, Susan)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #10 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Heather T. Rankie, Esq. Certificate of Good Standing due by 3/14/2022. Signed by Clerk on 1/13/2022. (Imbriani, Susan)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Christopher T. Micheletti, Esq. Certificate of Good Standing due by 3/14/2022. Signed by Clerk on 1/13/2022. (Imbriani, Susan)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Attorney(s) Anjalee M. Behti to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-6789025) by Wadner Brizeus, Tarrique Brooks-Bey. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Anjalee M. Behti)(Jasinski, Mathew) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Attorney(s) Heather T. Rankie to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-6788993) by Wadner Brizeus, Tarrique Brooks-Bey. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Heather T. Rankie)(Jasinski, Mathew) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Attorney(s) Christopher T. Micheletti to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-6788932) by Wadner Brizeus, Tarrique Brooks-Bey. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Christopher T. Micheletti)(Jasinski, Mathew) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER OF TRANSFER. Case reassigned to Judge Sarala V. Nagala for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 1/11/2022.(Caffrey, A.)
|
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Agilis Engineering, Inc., Belcan LLC, Co-Conspirator(2), Co-Conspirator(1), Cyient Inc., Does, Thomas Edwards, Robert Harvey, Steve Houghtaling, Frank O'Neill, Parametric Solutions, Inc., Mahesh Patel, Gary Prus, Quest Global Services NA, Inc., Raytheon Technologies Corporation, Harpreet Wasan* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Mathew P. Jasinski* *Motley Rice LLC* *One Corporate Ctr., 17th Fl., 20 Church St.* *Hartford, CT 06103*. (Fazekas, J.) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #2 Notice of Related Case filed by Tarrique Brooks-Bey, Wadner Brizeus, #5 Standing Protective Order, #4 Electronic Filing Order, #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #1 Complaint, filed by Tarrique Brooks-Bey, Wadner Brizeus Signed by Clerk on 12/29/2021.(Fazekas, J.) |
|
Filing 5
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 12/28/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 12/28/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 3
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 2/26/2022. Discovery due by 6/29/2022. Dispositive Motions due by 8/3/2022. Signed by Clerk on 12/28/2021.(Fazekas, J.)
|
| Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam added. (Anastasio, F.) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Related Case by Wadner Brizeus, Tarrique Brooks-Bey (Jasinski, Mathew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-6772984.), filed by Wadner Brizeus, Tarrique Brooks-Bey. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Jasinski, Mathew) Modified on 12/29/2021 to correct parties (Anastasio, F.). |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to All Defendants. (Jasinski, Mathew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
