Meade v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Brenna Elizabeth Meade |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| Social Security Administration |
| 3:2022cv00006 |
| January 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Thomas O Farrish |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of SSA Decision SSID - SSI Disability Cases |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULING ORDER. The Government having filed the administrative record on March 1, 2022., the Court hereby enters the following Scheduling Order: Plaintiff shall file a motion to reverse and/or remand and supporting memorandum of law no later than April 30, 2022. Defendant shall then have until June 29, 2022 to file a motion to affirm or a motion for voluntary remand. Within 14 days after Defendant files its motion, Plaintiff may file a reply pursuant to Local Rule 7(d). Prior to the filing of any dispositive motions, the parties are encouraged to confer regarding the merits of the case in an effort to determine whether a reversal and voluntary remand are appropriate. The Court reminds the parties of the previously filed Standing Scheduling Order which sets forth page limits and form and content requirements for motions and supporting memoranda. In addition to complying with these requirements, memoranda should avoid boilerplate discussions of the governing legal standards as the Court is familiar with the standard of review and the sequential evaluation process employed in the analysis of Social Security disability applications. The parties should focus on informing the Court of relevant and controlling legal authority and applying it to the facts of this case. Motions filed by the parties must comply with the requirements set forth above, in the Standing Scheduling Order, and in the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Failure to comply may result in denial of the motion.Requests for extensions of these deadlines are discouraged and, unless unusual circumstances dictate otherwise, counsel should not seek an extension of greater than thirty (30) days. Any motion for extension of a deadline must include a showing of good cause as required by Local Rule 7(b)(2) and must be filed at least three (3) days before the existing deadline. SO ORDERED at Hartford, Connecticut. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 3/2/22. (Esposito, A.)
|
|
Filing 16
Social Security Transcripts. (Fitzhugh, Nicol)
|
|
Filing 15
NOTICE of Appearance by Nicol Fitzhugh on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Fitzhugh, Nicol)
|
|
Filing 14
CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Commissioner of Social Security, Brenna Elizabeth Meade. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas O. Farrish. This matter has been transferred to a magistrate judge. All non-efiled submissions should be filed at the seat of court where the magistrate judge presides. The case number will remain the same, but must be followed by the magistrate judge's initials. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 2/3/2022.(Anastasio, F.)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 2/2/2022. (Wood, R.)
|
|
Filing 12
RESPONSE re #4 Order re: Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Brenna Elizabeth Meade. (Huebner, Gary)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 01/26/2022. (Farrish, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 10
Second MOTION for Extension of Time until 02/01/2022for plaintiff to file reply to order re: ifp motion by Brenna Elizabeth Meade. (Huebner, Gary)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time, notwithstanding its noncompliance with Local Rule 7(b)3's requirement that such motions be filed at least three days before the deadline sought to be extended, in light of the circumstances related in the motion. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 01/18/2022. (Farrish, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Order Re: Motion To Proceed In Forma Pauperis as to #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with supporting financial affidavit until 01/25/2022 by Brenna Elizabeth Meade. (Huebner, Gary)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER re: #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. See attached document. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 01/04/2022.(Farrish, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 7
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 01/3/2022.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 6
STANDING SCHEDULING ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 01/3/2022.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 5
STANDING ORDER ON SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 01/3/2022. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Answer deadline updated for Commissioner of Social Security to 3/4/2022. (Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Judge Stefan R. Underhill and Judge Thomas O. Farrish added. Motions referred to Thomas O. Farrish (Oliver, T.)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE by Brenna Elizabeth Meade of consent to magistrate jurisdiction (Huebner, Gary)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with supporting financial affidavit by Brenna Elizabeth Meade. (Huebner, Gary)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Brenna Elizabeth Meade. (Attachments: #1 Supplement notice of appeals council action)(Huebner, Gary)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
