Grebla v. Danbury Hospital
| Miroslaw Grebla and Miroslawa Grebla |
| Danbury Hospital |
| 3:2022cv00013 |
| January 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Sarah A L Merriam |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
ORDER re Initial Discovery Protocols Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 3/4/2022.(Caffrey, A.)
|
|
Filing 18
NOTICE of Appearance by Kasia M. Preneta on behalf of Danbury Hospital (Preneta, Kasia)
|
|
Filing 17
NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah R. Skubas on behalf of Danbury Hospital (Skubas, Sarah)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER granting, on consent, #15 Motion for Extension of Time until March 28, 2022, in which to respond to Amended Complaint.The Court grants this motion despite defendant's failure to comply with Local Rule 7, which requires: "All motions for extension of time shall be filed at least three (3) business days before the deadline sought to be extended, except in cases in which compelling circumstances warranting an extension arise during the three days before the deadline. Any motion for extension of time filed fewer than three business days before the deadline sought to be extended shall, in addition to satisfying all other requirements of this Rule, set forth reasons why the motion was not filed at least three business days before the deadline in question." D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 7(b)(3). Any future motions that do not comply with the Local Rules may be summarily denied.Finally, by virtue of defendant's appearance through the filing of the Motion for Extension of Time, the parties' Rule 26(f) Report of Parties' Planning Conference shall be filed on or before April 11, 2022. Counsel for defendant shall file a formal Notice of Appearance on the docket forthwith.It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 2/24/2022. (Katz, S.)
|
|
Filing 15
MOTION for Extension of Time until March 28, 2022 In Which to Respond to Amended Complaint by Danbury Hospital. (Skubas, Sarah)
|
|
Responsive pleading deadline updated for Danbury Hospital to 3/28/2022. (Katz, S.)
|
|
Set Deadlines: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 4/11/2022. (Katz, S.)
|
|
Filing 14
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Miroslawa Grebla. Danbury Hospital served on 2/4/2022, answer due 2/25/2022. (Avcollie, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #10 Motion to Seal. The Court finds clear and compelling reasons to seal the original Complaint, which has been completely superseded by the Amended Complaint (Doc. #12 ). Sealing is narrowly tailored, because the only information in the original Complaint that is not included in the Amended Complaint is plaintiff's full date of birth, which has been redacted to the year only in the Amended Complaint. See Amended Complaint, paragraph 11. The Court's Electronic Filing Policies and Procedures require redaction of birth dates to the year, making this redaction appropriate. Accordingly, the motion is GRANTED. Doc. #1 shall remain sealed until further order of the Court. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 1/6/2022. (Caffrey, A.)
|
|
Filing 12
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Danbury Hospital, filed by Miroslawa Grebla.(Caffrey, A.)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #9 Motion to Amend/Correct. The Clerk of Court is directed to docket the proposed Amended Complaint as a separate docket entry. The Amended Complaint shall be the operative pleading, completely superseding Doc. #1. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 1/6/2022. (Caffrey, A.)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION to Seal Complaint by Miroslaw Grebla. (Avcollie, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint by Miroslaw Grebla.Responses due by 1/27/2022 (Avcollie, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER. Counsel for plaintiff contacted the chambers of the undersigned by telephone yesterday, indicating that he wishes to correct the Complaint, and potentially to redact certain information in it. Counsel may filed an Amended Complaint as of right at any time. If the original Complaint contains information that counsel believes should be sealed, under the standards set forth in the Local Rules, he may also file a motion to seal the original Complaint. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 1/6/2022.(Caffrey, A.)
|
|
Filing 7
ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Danbury Hospital* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Mark Paul Carey* *Carey & Associates, P.C.* *71 Old Post Rd, Suite One* *Southport, CT 06890*. (Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #5 Notice Re: Initial Discovery Protocols, #3 Electronic Filing Order, #1 Complaint filed by Miroslaw Grebla, #4 Standing Protective Order Signed by Clerk on 01/5/2022.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE RE: INITIAL DISCOVERY PROTOCOLS Signed by Clerk on 01/04/2022. (Attachments: #1 Initial Discovery Protocols Attachment)(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 01/04/2022.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 3
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 01/04/2022.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Filing 2
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 3/5/2022. Discovery due by 7/6/2022. Dispositive Motions due by 8/10/2022. Signed by Clerk on 01/04/2022.(Fazekas, J.)
|
|
Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam added. (Anastasio, F.)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Danbury Hospital ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-6778666.), filed by Miroslaw Grebla. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Carey, Mark)
|
|
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Danbury Hospital. (Carey, Mark)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
