Gordon v. Hess
Michael Gordon |
Hess |
3:2022cv00053 |
January 11, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Alfred V Covello |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER granting #10 motion to seal medical records. Signed by Judge Alfred V. Covello on 03/01/22. (Covello, Alfred) |
Filing 13 Addendum to Emergency Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Michael Gordon. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Mendez, D) |
Filing 11 Sealed Document: Exhibit A BEMR medical records by Hess re #10 MOTION to Seal medical records, Exhibit A to motion to dismiss (ECF 9) . (Ikari, Carolyn) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Seal medical records, Exhibit A to motion to dismiss (ECF 9) by Hess. (Ikari, Carolyn) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss by Hess.Responses due by 3/18/2022 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Affidavit of Cheryl Magnusson, #3 Exhibit A BEMR files FILED UNDER SEAL, #4 Exhibit B Hess declaration, #5 Supplement Notice to Self-represented Litigant, #6 Appendix unreported cases)(Ikari, Carolyn) |
Set Deadlines/Hearings: Show Cause Response due by 3/17/2022 (Alexander, R.) |
Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 motion for extension of time within which to respond to the order to show cause to and including March 17, 2022. Signed by Judge Alfred V. Covello on 02/24/22. (Covello, Alfred) |
Filing fee received from Michael Gordon: $ 5.00, receipt number CTXH00018795 (Peterson, M) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time until March 17, 2022 to respond to #5 Order to Show Cause by Hess. (Ikari, Carolyn) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Carolyn Aiko Ikari on behalf of Hess , Acting Warden, in his official capacity (Ikari, Carolyn) |
Filing 5 Order to Show Cause Response due by 2/25/2022. Signed by Judge Alfred V. Covello on 2/3/2022.(Alexander, R.) |
Filing 4 ADDENDUM TO #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Michael Gordon (Payton, R.) |
Filing 3 Notice to petitioner re: Insufficiency. You must submit the filing fee of $5.00 or the attached IFP motion sent to you via U.S. mail. If insufficiency not corrected Dismissal due by 2/15/2022 Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 1/21/22.(Payton, R.) |
Filing 2 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Alfred V. Covello on 01/11/2022.(Fazekas, J.) |
Filing 1 PRISCS - Emergency PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Michael Gordon. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Fazekas, J.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Gordon v. Hess | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Michael Gordon | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Hess | |
Represented By: | Carolyn Aiko Ikari |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.