Chapman et al v. Cyient Inc. et al
Jason Chapman, Craig Johnston and Thomas Borino |
Cyient Inc., Raytheon Technologies Corporation, Agilis Engineering, Inc., Belcan Engineering Group, LLC, Parametric Solutions, Inc. and Quest Global Services NA, Inc. |
3:2022cv00166 |
January 28, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Sarala V Nagala |
Anti-Trust |
15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Cases associated. Create association to 3:21-cv-01657-SVN. (Payton, R.) |
Filing 14 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Complaint and Initiating Documents served on Agilis Eng., Belcan Eng., Cyient Inc., Quest Global Svcs., Raytheon Tech. on 02/03/2022, filed by Thomas Borino, Jason Chapman, Craig Johnston. (Guarnieri, Cody) |
Filing 13 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Complaint and Initiating Documents served on Parametric Solutions on February 7, 2022, filed by Thomas Borino, Jason Chapman, Craig Johnston. (Guarnieri, Cody) |
Filing 12 ORDER OF TRANSFER. Case reassigned to Judge Sarala V. Nagala for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 2/4/2022.(Freberg, B) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by James T. Shearin on behalf of Agilis Engineering, Inc. (Shearin, James) |
Filing 10 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Agilis Engineering, Inc., Belcan Engineering Group, LLC, Cyient Inc., Parametric Solutions, Inc., Quest Global Services NA, Inc., Raytheon Technologies Corporation* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Bruce E. Newman* *Brown, Paindiris & Scott, LLP* *100 Pearl Street* *Hartford, CT 06103*. (Freberg, B) |
Filing 9 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #1 Complaint filed by Craig Johnston, Jason Chapman, Thomas Borino, #8 Order, #2 Exhibit filed by Craig Johnston, Jason Chapman, Thomas Borino, #4 Notice of Appearance filed by Craig Johnston, Jason Chapman, Thomas Borino, #7 Protective Order, #5 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #3 Notice of Related Case filed by Craig Johnston, Jason Chapman, Thomas Borino, #6 Electronic Filing Order Signed by Clerk on 1/31/2022.(Freberg, B) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Cody Nolan Guarnieri on behalf of Thomas Borino, Jason Chapman, Craig Johnston (Guarnieri, Cody) |
Filing 8 STANDING ORDER RE DISCOVERY. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 1/28/2022.(Freberg, B) |
Filing 7 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 1/28/2022.(Freberg, B) |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 1/28/2022.(Freberg, B) |
Filing 5 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 3/29/2022; Discovery due by 7/30/2022; Dispositive Motions due by 9/3/2022. Signed by Clerk on 1/28/2022.(Freberg, B) |
Judge Janet C. Hall added. (Oliver, T.) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Related Case by All Plaintiffs (Newman, Bruce) |
Filing 2 EXHIBIT Civil Cover Sheet by Thomas Borino, Jason Chapman, Craig Johnston re #1 Complaint. (Newman, Bruce) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-6808979.), filed by Jason Chapman, Thomas Borino, Craig Johnston.(Newman, Bruce) |
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to All Defendants. (Newman, Bruce) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.