Lopresti v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Joseph Lopresti, III
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 3:2022cv00183
Filed: February 1, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Thomas O Farrish
Referring Judge: Stefan R Underhill
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULING ORDER. The Government having filed the administrative record on March 25, 2022., the Court hereby enters the following Scheduling Order: Plaintiff shall file a motion to reverse and/or remand and supporting memorandum of law no later than May 24, 2022. Defendant shall then have until July 23, 2022 to file a motion to affirm or a motion for voluntary remand. Within 14 days after Defendant files its motion, Plaintiff may file a reply pursuant to Local Rule 7(d). Prior to the filing of any dispositive motions, the parties are encouraged to confer regarding the merits of the case in an effort to determine whether a reversal and voluntary remand are appropriate. The Court reminds the parties of the previously filed Standing Scheduling Order which sets forth page limits and form and content requirements for motions and supporting memoranda. In addition to complying with these requirements, memoranda should avoid boilerplate discussions of the governing legal standards as the Court is familiar with the standard of review and the sequential evaluation process employed in the analysis of Social Security disability applications. The parties should focus on informing the Court of relevant and controlling legal authority and applying it to the facts of this case. Motions filed by the parties must comply with the requirements set forth above, in the Standing Scheduling Order, and in the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Failure to comply may result in denial of the motion.Requests for extensions of these deadlines are discouraged and, unless unusual circumstances dictate otherwise, counsel should not seek an extension of greater than thirty (30) days. Any motion for extension of a deadline must include a showing of good cause as required by Local Rule 7(b)(2) and must be filed at least three (3) days before the existing deadline. SO ORDERED at Hartford, Connecticut. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 4/1/22.(Esposito, A.)
April 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Commissioner of Social Security, Joseph Lopresti, III. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas O. Farrish. This matter has been transferred to a magistrate judge. All non-efiled submissions should be filed at the seat of court where the magistrate judge presides. The case number will remain the same, but must be followed by the magistrate judge's initials. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 4/1/2022.(Anastasio, F.)
March 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Consent NOTICE by Joseph Lopresti, III to Magistrate Judge (Olinsky, Howard)
March 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 REMINDER: Standing Order on Social Security Appeals Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 3/28/2022. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Anastasio, F.)
March 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Social Security Transcripts. (Fitzhugh, Nicol)
March 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicol Fitzhugh on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Fitzhugh, Nicol)
February 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 2/1/2022. (Oliver, T.)
February 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING SCHEDULING ORDER: Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 2/1/2022. (Oliver, T.)
February 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Standing Order on Social Security Appeals. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 2/1/2022. (Attachments: #1 Consent form) (Oliver, T.)
February 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-6813115.), filed by Joseph Lopresti III. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A: Notice of Appeals Council Action, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Olinsky, Howard)
February 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Answer deadline updated for Commissioner of Social Security to 4/2/2022. (Oliver, T.)
February 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Judge Stefan R. Underhill and Judge Thomas O. Farrish added. (Oliver, T.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lopresti v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph Lopresti, III
Represented By: Howard D. Olinsky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Nicol Fitzhugh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?