Mayberry v. Rausch Sturm LLP
Plaintiff: Sara Mayberry
Defendant: Rausch Sturm, LLP and Rausch Sturm LLP
Case Number: 3:2022cv00240
Filed: February 9, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Vanessa L Bryant
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER DISMISSING CASE as settled. Plaintiff has informed the Court that this case has settled. See Dkt. #11 Notice of Settlement. This dismissal is without prejudice to re-opening on or before 70 days following this order. If the parties wish to file a stipulation of dismissal for approval by the Court or simply for inclusion in the Court's file, they may do so on or before 70 days following this order. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 3/1/2022. (Burlingham, Corinne)
March 1, 2022 JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS SURVEY - FOR COUNSEL ONLY: The following link to the confidential survey requires you to log into CM/ECF for SECURITY purposes. Once in CM/ECF you will be prompted for the case number. Although you are receiving this survey through CM/ECF, it is hosted on an independent website called SurveyMonkey. Once in SurveyMonkey, the survey is located in a secure account. The survey is not docketed and it is not sent directly to the judge. To ensure anonymity, completed surveys are held up to 90 days before they are sent to the judge for review. We hope you will take this opportunity to participate, please click on this link: https://ecf.ctd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/Dispatch.pl?survey (Shafer, J.)
February 28, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE of Settlement by Sara Mayberry (Kennedy, Michael)
February 14, 2022 Filing 10 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Rausch Sturm LLP* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Michael W. Kennedy* *The Kennedy Law Firm* *103 Mile Creek Road* *Old Lyme, CT 06371*. (Shafer, J.)
February 14, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES: Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #5 Standing Protective Order, #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #1 Complaint, #6 Order Re: Chambers Practices, #4 Electronic Filing Order, 8 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, and #7 Electronic Service Documents. Signed by Clerk on 2-14-2022. (Shafer, J.)
February 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 2/14/2022. (Burlingham, Corinne)
February 10, 2022 Docket Entry Correction: #7 Notice to Counsel entered in error. (Shafer, J.)
February 10, 2022 Filing 7 ENTERED IN ERROR -- NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES: Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #5 Standing Protective Order, #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Sara Mayberry, #1 Complaint filed by Sara Mayberry, #6 Order Re: Chambers Practices, #4 Electronic Filing Order, #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines. Signed by Clerk on 2/10/22. (Velez, F.) Modified on 2/11/2022 (Shafer, J.).
February 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER RE: Judge's Chambers Practices. Counsel are directed to read and comply with the Chambers Practices and Standing Orders prior to filing any document. So ordered. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 2/9/22. (Velez, F.)
February 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 2/9/22. (Velez, F.)
February 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 2/9/22. (Velez, F.)
February 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 4/10/2022; Discovery due by 8/11/2022; Dispositive Motions due by 9/15/2022. Signed by Clerk on 2/9/22. (Velez, F.)
February 9, 2022 Judge Vanessa L. Bryant added. (Oliver, T.)
February 9, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Sara Mayberry. (Kennedy, Michael)
February 9, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Rausch Sturm, LLP, filed by Sara Mayberry. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-3, #2 Exhibit Civil Cover, #3 Exhibit Summons)(Kennedy, Michael)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mayberry v. Rausch Sturm LLP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sara Mayberry
Represented By: Michael W. Kennedy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rausch Sturm, LLP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rausch Sturm LLP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?