Paschal-Barros v. Rosenberg et al
| Kyle L. Paschal-Barros |
| Brett Rosenberg and Ferns-Brown |
| 3:2022cv00359 |
| March 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Thomas O Farrish |
| Sarah A L Merriam |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Docket Entry Correction re #13 Notice (Other) MODIFIED TO CORRECT THE FILE DATE FROM 5/5/22 TO 5/4/22 (Oliver, T.) |
| Filing 14 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Kyle L. Paschal-Barros. (Oliver, T.) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE to the Court by Kyle L. Paschal-Barros (Oliver, T.) Modified on 5/5/2022 (Oliver, T.). |
Filing 12
ORDER denying #10 Motion for Reconsideration. Federal courts generally do not reconsider their prior orders unless there has been an intervening change of controlling law, new evidence has become available, or there is a need to correct a clear error or prevent manifest injustice. See, e.g., Virgin Atl. Airways, Ltd. v. Nat'l Mediation Bd., 956 F.2d 1245, 1255 (2d Cir. 1992). In this case, there has been no change in the relevant law, no new evidence has been presented, and there is no error or injustice to correct.While the Court will not reconsider its order directing the plaintiff to file another trust account statement, it will clarify the order for his benefit. The Court did not order the plaintiff to re-file because his document is not a six-month document; rather, the Court ordered him to re-file because the document he filed was a partial, incomplete copy. A complete inmate trust account statement is a multi-page document that lists not only the inmate's debts and obligations, but also all transactions in and out of his account over the preceding six months. In this case, the plaintiff filed only the first page listing his debts and obligations. He did not include the remaining pages listing his account transactions.The plaintiff is again ordered to file a certified copy of a complete inmate trust account statement for the period September 2, 2021 - March 2, 2022. The Court will extend by two weeks - that is, until May 4, 2022 - his time period for doing so. The plaintiff is respectfully reminded that the Court sees dozens if not hundreds of CT DOC inmate trust account statements each year, and it knows the difference between a complete copy and an incomplete copy. Failure to file a complete, certified copy by May 4, 2022 may result in dismissal of the case. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 04/20/2022. (Farrish, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Thomas O. Farrish for #10 MOTION for Reconsideration re 9 Notice to petitioner re: Incomplete Inmate Trust Fund Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 4/20/2022.(Caffrey, A.)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Reconsideration re 9 Notice to petitioner re: Incomplete Inmate Trust Fund Account Statement by Kyle L. Paschal-Barros. (Oliver, T.) |
| Filing 9 Notice to petitioner re: Incomplete Inmate Trust Fund Account Statement. You are directed to file a complete and current ledger sheet showing the past six months transactions, certified by prison official. If insufficiency not corrected, Dismissal due by 4/22/2022 Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 4/8/2022.(Corriette, M.) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER. All counsel and self-represented parties are advised that any requests for relief, including the rescheduling of conferences or hearings that have been calendared on ECF, must be made by filing of a motion on the docket, in full compliance with all applicable Federal and Local Rules. Relief from deadlines, orders, and calendars may not be obtained by calling or emailing chambers staff or the Clerk's Office. Court staff cannot provide advice or guidance, and ex parte communications with the Court are generally improper. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 3/7/2022.(Caffrey, A.)
|
|
Filing 7
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 3/7/2022. (Oliver, T.)
|
|
Filing 6
Prisoner E-Filing Standing Order on Prisoner Electronic Filing Program Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 3/7/2022. (Oliver, T.)
|
|
Filing 5
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Sarah A. L. Merriam on 3/7/2022. (Oliver, T.)
|
| Filing 4 PRISCS - Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Kyle L. Paschal-Barros. (Oliver, T.) |
| Filing 3 PRISCS - Prisoner Authorization Form by Kyle L. Paschal-Barros. (Oliver, T.) |
| Filing 2 PRISCS - MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kyle L. Paschal-Barros. (Oliver, T.) |
| Filing 1 PRISCS - COMPLAINT against Ferns Brown, Brett Rosenberg, filed by Kyle L. Paschal-Barros. (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
