Duhaime v. Uncle Matt's Organic, Inc.
| Diane Duhaime |
| Uncle Matt's Organic, Inc. |
| 3:2022cv00391 |
| March 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Stefan R Underhill |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time until 05/21/2022 for Defendant to Respond to Complaint. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 4/22/2022. (Hurley, S.)
|
| Answer deadline updated for Uncle Matt's Organic, Inc. to 5/21/2022. (Hurley, S.) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time until 05/21/2022 for Defendant to Respond to Complaint by Diane Duhaime. (Leviton, Jason) |
| Answer deadline updated for Uncle Matt's Organic, Inc. to 4/21/2022. (Oliver, T.) |
| Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons, Complaint etc. served on Uncle Matt's Organic, Inc. on 03/31/2022, filed by Diane Duhaime. (Leviton, Jason) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #3 Electronic Filing Order, #4 Protective Order, #1 Complaint filed by Diane Duhaime, #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #5 Electronic Summons Issued, Signed by Clerk on 3/17/2022. (Oliver, T.) |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Uncle Matt's Organic, Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Jason M. Leviton* *Block & Leviton LLP* *260 Franklin Street, Ste 1860* *Boston, MA 02110*. (Oliver, T.) |
|
Filing 4
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 3/16/2022. (Oliver, T.)
|
|
Filing 3
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 3/16/2022. (Oliver, T.)
|
|
Filing 2
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 5/15/2022 Discovery due by 9/15/2022 Dispositive Motions due by 10/20/2022 Signed by Clerk on 3/16/2022. (Oliver, T.)
|
| Judge Stefan R. Underhill added. (Freberg, B) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Uncle Matt's Organic, Inc. ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-6867559.), filed by Diane Duhaime. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Leviton, Jason) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Uncle Matt's Organic, Inc.. (Leviton, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Duhaime v. Uncle Matt's Organic, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Diane Duhaime | |
| Represented By: | Jason M. Leviton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Uncle Matt's Organic, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
