Hunt v. Manchester et al
| Daniel Hunt |
| Town of Manchester, John Doe #1, John Doe #2, Officer Doe #3, John Doe and Doe |
| 3:2022cv00450 |
| March 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Robert N Chatigny |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
ORDER granting in part #19 Motion For Prefiling Conference. The prefiling conference requirement is hereby waived. Defendants may file their motion to dismiss without a prefiling conference. So ordered. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 5/19/2022. (Rickevicius, L.)
|
| Filing 19 MOTION Renewed Request for Pre-Filing Conference by Doe, John Doe(#2), John Doe(#1), Town of Manchester.Responses due by 6/9/2022 (Tallberg, James) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE OF E-FILED CALENDAR: THIS IS THE ONLY NOTICE COUNSEL/THE PARTIES WILL RECEIVE. Telephone Status Conference set for 9/20/2022 at 3:30 PM before Judge Robert N. Chatigny. Please use the following dial in information for the call. Dial 866-434-5269, Access Code 8189198#. (Rickevicius, L.) |
|
Filing 17
SCHEDULING ORDER: Please read full text of attached Order. Discovery due by 5/31/2023; Initial Status Report due by 6/9/2022; Prefiling Conference Request Re: Dispositive Motions due 4/16/2023; Settlement Conference 6/2023; Trial Ready Date 8/30/2023; Trial Brief due by 7/31/2023. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 5/9/2022. (Rickevicius, L.)
|
| Filing 16 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Tallberg, James) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER granting #14 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to 5/20/2022 within which to answer or otherwise respond to plaintiff's complaint.. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 4/29/2022. (Rickevicius, L.)
|
| Filing 14 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time until May 20, 2022 to Plead by Doe, John Doe(#2), John Doe(#1), Town of Manchester. (Tallberg, James) |
| Answer deadline updated for All Defendants. (Rickevicius, L.) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER denying without prejudice #12 Motion for Prefiling Conference for failure to comply with the prefiling conference requirements which state that no request for a prefiling conference may be submitted unless the attorney making the request has conferred with other counsel of record and discussed the proposed motion in a good faith effort to clarify the issues, eliminate or reduce the area of controversy and arrive at a mutually satisfactory resolution. Cf. D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 37(2)(requiring counsel to confer before filing motionsrelating to discovery disputes). Any request for a prefiling conference must include a statement that the attorney submitting the request has conferred with other counsel and must briefly describe the results of the conference. So ordered. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 4/28/2022. (Rickevicius, L.)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION Request for Pre-Filing Conference by Doe, John Doe(#2), John Doe(#1), Town of Manchester.Responses due by 5/19/2022 (Tallberg, James) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew James Glass on behalf of Doe, John Doe(#2), John Doe(#1), Town of Manchester (Glass, Andrew) |
| Answer deadline updated for Doe to 4/29/2022; John Doe(#2) to 4/29/2022; John Doe(#1) to 4/29/2022; Town of Manchester to 4/29/2022. (Rickevicius, L.) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to 4/29/2022 within which to answer orotherwise respond to plaintiff's complaint. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 3/29/2022. (Rickevicius, L.)
|
| Filing 9 First MOTION for Extension of Time until 4/29/2022 Answer Complaint by Doe, John Doe(#2), John Doe(#1), Town of Manchester. (Tallberg, James) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #2 Notice of Appearance filed by John Doe, Town of Manchester, #1 Notice of Removal, filed by John Doe, Town of Manchester, #6 Electronic Filing Order, #3 Notice filed by John Doe, Town of Manchester, #7 Standing Protective Order, #5 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #4 Notice filed by John Doe, Town of Manchester Signed by Clerk on 3/28/2022. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order on Removed Cases)(LaLone, L.) |
|
Filing 7
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 3/25/2022.(LaLone, L.)
|
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 3/25/2022.(LaLone, L.)
|
|
Filing 5
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 5/24/2022 Discovery due by 9/24/2022 Dispositive Motions due by 10/29/2022 Signed by Clerk on 3/25/2022.(LaLone, L.)
|
| Judge Robert N. Chatigny added. (Oliver, T.) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE by John Doe #1, John Doe #2, Officer Doe #3, Town of Manchester of Pending Motions (Tallberg, James) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by John Doe #1, John Doe #2, Officer Doe #3, Town of Manchester Statement of James Tallberg (Tallberg, James) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by James Newhall Tallberg on behalf of John Doe #1, John Doe #2, Officer Doe #3, Town of Manchester (Tallberg, James) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by John Doe #2, John Doe #1, Town of Manchester, Officer Doe #3 from Hartford Superior Court Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACTDC-6878628, filed by John Doe #2, John Doe #1, Town of Manchester, Officer Doe #3. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Complaint, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Tallberg, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
