Bristol v. Connecticut Department of Corrections et al
| Brandon Bristol |
| Connecticut Department of Corrections, Rollin Cook, Brunell, Whittingham and Jane Doe |
| 3:2022cv00458 |
| March 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Victor A Bolden |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. On April 6, 2022, the Court issued an order notifying Mr. Bristol that his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis was deficient and that his case may be dismissed, unless he filed his inmate trust account statement showing transactions during the six month period preceding his Complaint. See Notice, ECF No. 7 (Apr. 6, 2022). Mr. Bristol has failed to file this documentation, or otherwise paid the filing fee. Accordingly, Plaintiffs complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. See Local R. Civ. P. 41(a) ("In civil actions in which... deadlines established by the Court under Rule 16 appear not to have been met, the Clerk shall give notice of proposed dismissal to counsel of record and pro se parties, if any. If such notice has been given and no action has been taken in the action in the meantime and no satisfactory explanation is submitted to the Court... the Clerk shall enter an order of dismissal."); see also McDonald v. Head Crim. Ct. Supervisor Officer, 850 F.2d 121, 124 (2d Cir. 1988) ("[W]hile pro se litigants may in general deserve more lenient treatment than those represented by counsel, all litigants, including pro se, have an obligation to comply with court orders.").Mr. Bristol may move to reopen this case if he submits his six-month inmate trust account statement or pays the filing fee; Mr. Bristol's motion to reopen also must explain why he has good cause for failing to comply with the Court's last order. The Clerk of Court respectfully is directed to close the case. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 5/9/2022. (Dalton, A.)
|
|
Filing 7
Notice to petitioner re: Insufficiency. A federal law, 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(2), states that if a prisoner wishes to file a civil lawsuit without prepaying the $402 filing fee, he must not only submit an affidavit showing that he cannot afford to pay the fee all at once, but must also submit a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding his complaint. In this case, the plaintiff filed only a one-month account statement. He is therefore ordered to file a six-month statement by April 27, 2022. He is respectfully advised that if he fails to do so, his case may be dismissed. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 4/6/2022.(Corriette, M.)
|
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 3/28/2022.(Freberg, B)
|
|
Filing 5
E-Filing Standing Order on Prisoner Electronic Filing Program. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 3/28/2022.(Freberg, B)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 3/28/2022.(Freberg, B)
|
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Brandon Bristol. (Freberg, B) |
| Filing 2 PRISCS - MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Brandon Bristol. (Freberg, B) |
| Filing 1 PRISCS - COMPLAINT against Brunell, Connecticut Department of Corrections, Rollin Cook, Jane Doe, Whittingham, filed by Brandon Bristol. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Freberg, B) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
