Gotiangco v. Warden
Petitioner: Roiland Gotiangco
Respondent: Danbury, Warden and Warden Timethea Pullen
Case Number: 3:2022cv00479
Filed: April 1, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey A Meyer
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 19, 2022 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Timethea Pullen of Local Rule 12(a) Notice to Self-Represented Litigants (Putnam, Nathaniel)
May 18, 2022 Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss the Petition and Response to the Court's Show Cause Order by Timethea Pullen.Responses due by 6/8/2022 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Putnam, Nathaniel)
May 18, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Nathaniel Michael Putnam on behalf of Timethea Pullen in her official capacity as the Warden of FCI Danbury (Putnam, Nathaniel)
April 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: It is hereby ORDERED that the respondent file a response on or before May 18, 2022 why the relief prayed for in the petition for writ of habeas corpus should not be granted, and it is ORDERED that the Clerk serve a copy of this order and a copy of the petition and all attachments to respondents representative, AUSA Michelle McConaghy of the U.S. Attorney's Office, by email on or before April 9, 2022. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 4/5/22.(Barry, Donna)
April 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 4/1/2022. (Fanelle, N.)
April 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 4/1/2022. (Fanelle, N.)
April 1, 2022 Filing 1 PRISCS PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Roiland Gotiangco. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Fanelle, N.)
April 1, 2022 Filing fee received from Roiland Gotiangco: $5.00, receipt number CTXB00012851. (Fanelle, N.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gotiangco v. Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Roiland Gotiangco
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Danbury
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Timethea Pullen
Represented By: Nathaniel Michael Putnam
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?