Pacific Life Insurance Company v. Weathers et al
| Pacific Life Insurance Company |
| Winston G Weathers and Matthew L Corrente |
| 3:2022cv00486 |
| April 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Vanessa L Bryant |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Winston G Weathers. A motion for default judgment pursuant to FRCP 55(b) shall be filed by 6-30-2022 or this action will be dismissed. (Shafer, J.) |
Filing 11
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE within seven days of the date of this order why default should not be entered in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Plaintiff properly served Defendant Winston G Weathers and Defendant's Answer was due 5-3-2022 (see Dkt. #10 ). The Clerk will enter default against Defendant Weathers if defendant does not comply with this order. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 5-20-2022. (Shafer, J.)
|
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Pacific Life Insurance Company. Winston G Weathers served on 4/12/2022, answer due 5/3/2022. (Spadaccini, Louis) |
| Filing 9 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Matthew L Corrente* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Louis Anthony Spadaccini* *Blackwell, Davis & Spadaccini, LLC* *158 East Center Street* *Manchester, CT 06040*. (Velez, F.) |
| Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Winston G Weathers* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Louis Anthony Spadaccini* *Blackwell, Davis & Spadaccini, LLC* *158 East Center Street* *Manchester, CT 06040*. (Velez, F.) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES: Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #1 Complaint filed by Pacific Life Insurance Company, #6 Order Re: Chambers Practices, #5 Standing Protective Order, #2 Exhibit filed by Pacific Life Insurance Company, #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #4 Electronic Filing Order. Signed by Clerk on 4/4/22. (Velez, F.) |
| Filing 2 EXHIBIT Civil Cover Sheet by Pacific Life Insurance Company re #1 Complaint. (Spadaccini, Louis) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER RE: Judge's Chambers Practices. Counsel are directed to read and comply with the Chambers Practices and Standing Orders prior to filing any document. So ordered. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 4/3/22. (Velez, F.)
|
|
Filing 5
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 4/3/22. (Velez, F.)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Vanessa L. Bryant on 4/3/22. (Velez, F.)
|
|
Filing 3
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 6/2/2022; Discovery due by 10/3/2022; Dispositive Motions due by 11/7/2022. Signed by Clerk on 4/3/22. (Velez, F.)
|
| Judge Vanessa L. Bryant added. (Freberg, B) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-6887121.), filed by Pacific Life Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B)(Spadaccini, Louis) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Winston G Weathers. (Spadaccini, Louis) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Matthew L Corrente. (Spadaccini, Louis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
