Cruz v. Waterbury et al
Emmanuel Cruz |
City of Waterbury and Retirement Board of the City of Waterbury |
3:2022cv00502 |
April 5, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Omar A Williams |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Set Deadlines as to #11 MOTION to Dismiss . Responses due by 6/24/2022. (Velez, F.) |
Filing 13 ORDER: Order granting CONSENT Motion for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. #12 , with the court's wishes of good health to all. The plaintiff shall file his responsive pleading by June 24, 2022. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Omar A. Williams on 06/10/2022. (Allums, Kenneshea) |
Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #11 MOTION to Dismiss until 06/24/2022 by Emmanuel Cruz. (Trella, Donald) |
Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss by Retirement Board of the City of Waterbury, City of Waterbury.Responses due by 6/9/2022 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support)(Mengacci, Joseph) |
Answer deadline updated for Retirement Board of the City of Waterbury to 5/19/2022; City of Waterbury to 5/19/2022. (Velez, F.) |
Filing 10 ORDER: Order granting CONSENT Motion for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading, ECF No #9 . The defendant shall file his response on or before May 19, 2022. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Omar A. Williams on 05/02/2022. (Allums, Kenneshea) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time until May 19, 2022 to file a responsive pleading by Retirement Board of the City of Waterbury, City of Waterbury. (Mengacci, Joseph) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph A. Mengacci on behalf of Retirement Board of the City of Waterbury, City of Waterbury (Mengacci, Joseph) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Emmanuel Cruz. Retirement Board of the City of Waterbury served on 4/7/2022, answer due 4/28/2022; City of Waterbury served on 4/7/2022, answer due 4/28/2022. (Trella, Donald) |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Retirement Board of the City of Waterbury, City of Waterbury* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Donald Jeremiah Trella* *Grady & Riley* *86 Buckingham Street* *Waterbury, CT 06710*. (Velez, F.) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES: Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #3 Electronic Filing Order, #4 Standing Protective Order, #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #1 Complaint filed by Emmanuel Cruz. Signed by Clerk on 4/6/22. (Velez, F.) |
Filing 4 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Omar A. Williams on 4/5/22. (Velez, F.) |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Omar A. Williams on 4/5/22. (Velez, F.) |
Filing 2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 6/4/2022; Discovery due by 10/5/2022; Dispositive Motions due by 11/9/2022. Signed by Clerk on 4/5/22. (Velez, F.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of Waterbury, Retirement Board of the City of Waterbury ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-6890254.), filed by Emmanuel Cruz.(Trella, Donald) |
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to City of Waterbury, Retirement Board of the City of Waterbury. (Trella, Donald) |
Judge Omar A. Williams added. (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.