Lewis v. City of Hartford et al
Joshua Lewis |
City of Hartford and Jason Thody |
3:2022cv00508 |
April 6, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Alfred V Covello |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Jones, Gregory) |
Answer deadline updated for Jason Thody. The time to file a responsive pleading to and including July 1, 2022. (Alexander, R.) |
Filing 14 ORDER granting #13 motion for extension of time to file a responsive pleading to and including July 1, 2022. Signed by Judge Alfred V. Covello on 05/20/22. (Codeanne, K.) |
Answer deadline updated for Jason Thody to 7/1/2022. (Alexander, R.) |
Set Deadlines/Hearings: Discovery due by 3/10/202. Dispositive Motions due by 4/7/2023. Trial Brief due by 5/5/2023. Trial Ready Date 6/2/2023. (Alexander, R.) |
Filing 13 MOTION for Extension of Time until July 1, 2022 file a responsive pleading by Jason Thody. (Feola-Guerrieri, Nathalie) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Nathalie Feola-Guerrieri on behalf of Jason Thody in his individual capacity (Feola-Guerrieri, Nathalie) |
Filing 11 Amended SUMMONS Returned Executed by Joshua Lewis. (Jones, Gregory) |
Filing 10 ENTERED IN ERROR - Amended SUMMONS Returned Executed by Joshua Lewis. Jason Thody served on 5/2/2022, answer due 5/23/2022. (Jones, Gregory) Modified on 5/17/2022 (Chartier, AnnMarie). |
Answer deadline updated for City of Hartford to 7/1/2022. (Alexander, R.) |
Filing 9 ORDER granting #8 consent motion for extension of time to respond to the complaint to and including July 1, 2022. Signed by Judge Alfred V. Covello on 05/03/22. (Codeanne, K.) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time until July 1, 2022 to file a responsive pleading to #1 Complaint by City of Hartford, Jason Thody. (Feola-Guerrieri, Nathalie) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Nathalie Feola-Guerrieri on behalf of City of Hartford, Jason Thody in his official capacity (Feola-Guerrieri, Nathalie) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Joshua Lewis. All Defendants. (Jones, Gregory) |
Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *City of Hartford, Jason Thody* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Gregory Alan Jones, Fazzano & Tomasiewicz LLC* *96 Oak Street* *Hartford, CT 06106*. (Mendez, D) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES: Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #1 Complaint filed by Joshua Lewis, #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, and #3 Electronic Filing Order. Signed by Clerk on 04/7/2022. (Mendez, D) |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Alfred V. Covello on 04/6/2022. (Mendez, D) |
Filing 2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 6/5/2022. Discovery due by 10/6/2022. Dispositive Motions due by 11/10/2022. Signed by Clerk on 04/6/2022. (Mendez, D) |
Judge Alfred V. Covello added. (Oliver, T.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-6891534.), filed by Joshua Lewis. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Release of Jurisdiction)(Jones, Gregory) |
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to All Defendants. (Jones, Gregory) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.