Juul Labs, Inc. v. EZ Mart Foods of CT, Inc.
| Juul Labs, Inc. |
| EZ Mart Foods of CT, Inc. |
| 3:2022cv00515 |
| April 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Omar A Williams |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Amended AFFIDAVIT of Service for Complaint and pleadings served on EZ Mart Foods of CT on 04/09/2022, filed by Juul Labs, Inc.. (Linderman, John) |
| Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Complaint and pleadings served on EZ Mart Foods of CT on 04/09/2022, filed by Juul Labs, Inc.. (Linderman, John) |
| Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *EZ Mart Foods of CT, Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *John C. Linderman* *McCormick, Paulding & Huber* *CityPlace II, 185 Asylum Street* *Hartford, CT 06103-4102*. (Velez, F.) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES: Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Juul Labs, Inc., #6 Report on Patent/Trademark Form, #5 Standing Protective Order, #1 Complaint filed by Juul Labs, Inc., #4 Electronic Filing Order. Signed by Clerk on 4/8/22. (Velez, F.) |
| Filing 6 AO 120 Report on the Filing of an Action re: Patent or Trademark Form Completed. (Velez, F.) |
Filing 5
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Omar A. Williams on 4/7/22. (Velez, F.)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Omar A. Williams on 4/7/22. (Velez, F.)
|
|
Filing 3
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 6/6/2022; Discovery due by 10/7/2022; Dispositive Motions due by 11/11/2022. Signed by Clerk on 4/7/22. (Velez, F.)
|
| Judge Omar A. Williams added. (Freberg, B) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Juul Labs, Inc.. (Linderman, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against EZ Mart Foods of CT Inc ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-6893190.), filed by Juul Labs, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Supplement)(Linderman, John) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to EZ Mart Foods of CT, Inc.. (Linderman, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Juul Labs, Inc. v. EZ Mart Foods of CT, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Juul Labs, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | John C. Linderman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: EZ Mart Foods of CT, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
