Dubay v. Webcollex, LLC
| Keryl Dubay |
| Webcollex, LLC |
| 3:2022cv00526 |
| April 11, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Stefan R Underhill |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Answer deadline updated for Webcollex, LLC to 6/24/2022. (Reis, Julia) |
Filing 11
ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to file a responsive pleading. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 05.31.22. (Powell, G.)
|
| Set Deadlines/Hearings: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 7/11/2022. (Powell, G.) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew Douglas Bullard on behalf of Webcollex, LLC (Bullard, Andrew) |
| Filing 9 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time until June 24, 2022 to file a responsive pleading #1 Complaint by Webcollex, LLC. (Blatchley, Thomas) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas C. Blatchley on behalf of Webcollex, LLC (Blatchley, Thomas) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Keryl Dubay. All Defendants. (Woods, Roderick) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #3 Electronic Filing Order, #4 Protective Order, #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #1 Complaint filed by Keryl Dubay Signed by Clerk on 4/12/2022. (Oliver, T.) |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Webcollex, LLC* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Roderick David Woods* *The Woods Law Firm, LLC* *360 Bloomfield Avenue, Suite 301* *Windsor, CT 06095*. (Oliver, T.) |
|
Filing 4
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 4/11/2022. (Oliver, T.)
|
|
Filing 3
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 4/11/2022. (Oliver, T.)
|
|
Filing 2
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 6/10/2022 Discovery due by 10/11/2022 Dispositive Motions due by 11/15/2022 (Oliver, T.)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Webcollex, LLC ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-6896168.), filed by Keryl Dubay.(Woods, Roderick) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Webcollex, LLC. (Woods, Roderick) |
| Judge Stefan R. Underhill added. (Freberg, B) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dubay v. Webcollex, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Keryl Dubay | |
| Represented By: | Roderick David Woods |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Webcollex, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Andrew Douglas Bullard |
| Represented By: | Thomas C. Blatchley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
