106A Comstock Hill LLC v. Savvidis et al
| 106A Comstock Hill LLC doing business as Christ |
| Alexandros Savvidis and Maria Savvidis |
| 3:2022cv00556 |
| April 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Michael P Shea |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case remanded to State Court Judicial District of Stamford-Norwalk. (Johnson, D.) |
Filing 9
ORDER: The plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #2 ) is denied as moot. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 5/12/22. (Constantine, A.)
|
| JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS SURVEY - FOR COUNSEL ONLY: The following link to the confidential survey requires you to log into CM/ECF for SECURITY purposes. Once in CM/ECF you will be prompted for the case number. Although you are receiving this survey through CM/ECF, it is hosted on an independent website called SurveyMonkey. Once in SurveyMonkey, the survey is located in a secure account. The survey is not docketed and it is not sent directly to the judge. To ensure anonymity, completed surveys are held up to 90 days before they are sent to the judge for review. We hope you will take this opportunity to participate, please click on this link: https://ecf.ctd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/Dispatch.pl?survey (Johnson, D.) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: The response period has expired and the Defendant has not filed anything in response to the Court's order, see ECF No. 7. The case is remanded to the state court because this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 5/11/22. (Constantine, A.)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the attached, Defendant Maria Savvidis shall have fourteen days from the issuance of this order to show cause as to why this case should not be remanded to state court. Nothing in this order shall toll or stay the deadline for the filing of any motion to remand. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 4/21/22. (Constantine, A.)
|
| Filing 6 ENTERED IN ERROR - NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #4 Electronic Filing Order, #1 Notice of Removal filed by Maria Savvidis, #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Maria Savvidis, #5 Protective Order, #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines Signed by Clerk on 4/20/2022. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order on Removed Cases) (Oliver, T.) Modified on 4/21/2022 TO NOTE ENTRY HAS BEEN ENTERED IN ERROR (Oliver, T.). |
|
Filing 5
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 4/19/2022. (Oliver, T.)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 4/19/2022. (Oliver, T.)
|
|
Filing 3
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 6/18/2022 Discovery due by 10/19/2022 Dispositive Motions due by 11/23/2022 Signed by Clerk on 4/19/2022. (Oliver, T.)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Maria Savvidis. (Oliver, T.) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Maria Savvidis from Superior Court for the Judicial District of Stamford-Norwalk, case number NWH-CV22-6007084-S., filed by Maria Savvidis. (Attachments: #1 Copy of Civil Cover Sheet) (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
