Billie v. Dubay et al
| Petura Billie |
| Kevin Dubay, Patty Pittman, Susan Kenkos, Deutshce Bank Trust Company, Kevin Galin, Dominick Neveux, George Generas, Law Office of Bendett & Mchugh PC, Karen Elizabeth Mcarthur, Law Office of Locke Lord LLP, Melanie Dykas, John Forrest, Jagish Patel, Surekha Patel and Leopold & Associates PLLC |
| 3:2022cv00562 |
| April 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Jeffrey A Meyer |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER RE OBJECTION. Plaintiff has filed an objection to the Court's order denying her motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Doc. #7. She has simultaneously filed a notice of appeal of the Court's order. Doc. #8. "The filing of a notice of appeal is an event of jurisdictional significanceit confers jurisdiction on the court of appeals and divests the district court of its control over those aspects of the case involved in the appeal." Griggs v. Provident Consumer Disc. Co., 459 U.S. 56, 58 (1982). Accordingly, because the plaintiff's notice of appeal has divested this Court of jurisdiction to consider plaintiff's objection, the Court is unable at this time to address plaintiff's objection. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 5/25/22.(Barry, Donna)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER. The docket reflects that plaintiff has paid the filing fee. Accordingly, plaintiff should ensure that she timely completes service of process on each of the defendants as required under Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff may also wish to consult the Court's "Guide for Self-Represented Litigants" which is available on the Court's website for further guidance about her obligations to ensure that each defendant is properly and timely served. The Court advises that it may dismiss the complaint as to any defendant whom the plaintiff has not served with process within 90 days as required under Rule 4. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 5/25/22.(Barry, Donna)
|
| Filing 9 CLERK'S CERTIFICATE RE: INDEX AND RECORD ON APPEAL re: #8 Notice of Appeal. The attached docket sheet is hereby certified as the entire Index/Record on Appeal in this matter and electronically sent to the Court of Appeals, with the exception of any manually filed documents as noted below. Dinah Milton Kinney, Clerk. Documents manually filed not included in this transmission: none. (Bozek, M.) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 6 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petura Billie. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits)(Bozek, M.) |
| Filing 7 OBJECTION to 6 Denial of the Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Petura Billie. (Bozek, M.) |
| Filing fee received from Petura Billie: $ 402.00, receipt number CTXH00019023 (Peterson, M) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (Doc. #2 ). Plaintiff has filed this pro se civil RICO action against numerous judges and attorneys. Plaintiff has moved for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and her affidavit demonstrates that plaintiff earns $3,400 per month (currently from workers compensation in connection with employment at the US Postal Service). Although plaintiff lists obligations that exceed this income, it does not appear that plaintiff has any dependents or that plaintiff cannot reasonably decrease spending in order to pay the filing fee. For example, plaintiff alleges an extraordinary amount of $500 per month spent on clothing, as well as other unspecified insurance insurance payments of $200 per month, a $180 phone bill per month, and $900 per month on cable, car gas and another unintelligible item. Plaintiff has not demonstrated that payment of the filing fee would impose substantial hardship or require foregoing the necessities of life. See Potnick v. Eastern State Hosp., 701 F.2d 243, 244 (2d Cir. 1983 (per curiam). Accordingly, the Court DENIES the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. #2 ), and plaintiff shall pay the filing fee on or before May 23, 2022, or this action shall be dismissed. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 4/21/22. (Barry, Donna)
|
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 4/19/2022.(Carr, Dave)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 4/19/2022.(Carr, Dave)
|
|
Filing 3
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 6/18/2022 Discovery due by 10/19/2022 Dispositive Motions due by 11/23/2022 Signed by Clerk on 4/19/2022.(Carr, Dave)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Petura Billie. (Carr, Dave) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Deutshce Bank Trust Company, Kevin Dubay, Melanie Dykas, John Forrest, Kevin Galin, George Generas, Susan Kenkos, Law Office of Bendett & Mchugh PC, Law Office of Locke Lord LLP, Karen Elizabeth Mcarthur, Dominick Neveux, Jagish Patel, Surekha Patel, Patty Pittman, Leopold & Associates PPLC, filed by Petura Billie. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Carr, Dave) Modified on 4/22/2022 to add defendant (Carr, Dave). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
