Calix v. Pullen
| Andre Calix |
| T. Pullen |
| 3:2022cv00574 |
| April 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Kari A Dooley |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER denying #9 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; finding as moot #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff's failure to tender the $5.00 filing fee within thirty days of this order will result in dismissal of the action. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 6/13/2022. (Bernard, Hannah)
|
|
Filing 11
EMERGENCY MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Andre Calix. Responses due by 6/10/2022. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Fanelle, N.)
|
|
Filing 10
Prisoner Authorization Form by Andre Calix. (Imbriani, Susan)
|
|
Filing 9
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Andre Calix. (Attachments: #1 letter, #2 envelope)(Imbriani, Susan)
|
|
Filing 8
AMENDED ORDER re: #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Plaintiffs may not file habeas corpus petitions without either paying the $5 filing fee or filing a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. In this case, the plaintiff did neither. He has written a letter to the Clerk of the Court, asking that a copy of the District of Connecticut standard-form in forma pauperis application be mailed to him. The Clerk is respectfully directed to mail a copy of the form to the plaintiff at his address of record, and to note on the docket that she has done so. The plaintiff is ordered to fill out the form fully and accurately, and to file it with the Clerk along with a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement for the period October 21, 2022 through April 21, 2022. The plaintiff must do so by May 13, 2022 or his action may be dismissed. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 4/27/2022.(LaLone, L.)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER re: #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis/ Plaintiffs may not initiate civil matters without either paying the $402 filing fee or filing a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. In this case, the plaintiff did neither. He has written a letter to the Clerk of the Court, asking that a copy of the District of Connecticut standard-form in forma pauperis application be mailed to him. The Clerk is respectfully directed to mail a copy of the form to the plaintiff at his address of record, and to note on the docket that she has done so. The plaintiff is ordered to fill out the form fully and accurately, and to file it with the Clerk along with a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement for the period October 21, 2022 April 21, 2022. The plaintiff must do so by May 13, 2022 or his action may be dismissed. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 4/22/22.(Wood, R.)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER Vacating to correct typographical errors, re 5 Order. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 4/22/22.(Wood, R.)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER re: #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis/ Plaintiffs may not initiate civil matters without either paying the $402 filing fee or filing a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. In this case, the plaintiff did neither. He has written a letter to the Clerk of the Court, asking that a copy of the District of Connecticut standard-form in forma pauperis application be mailed to him. The Clerk is respectfully directed to mail a copy of the form to the plaintiff at his address of record, and to note on the docket that she has done so. The plaintiff is ordered to fill out the form fully and accurately, and to file it with the Clerk along with a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement for the period October 21, 2022 April 21, 2022. The plaintiff must do so by May 13, 2022 or his action may be dismissed. sent a letter to the Court, requesting a copy of the District of Connecticut standard-form in forma pauperis application. The Clerk of the Court docketed the letter as a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 4/22/22.(Wood, R.)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 4/21/22.(Pesta, J.)
|
|
Filing 3
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 4/21/22.(Pesta, J.)
|
|
Filing 2
PRISCS MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Andre Calix. (Pesta, J.)
|
|
Filing 1
PRISCS PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Andre Calix.(Pesta, J.) Modified text on 4/21/2022 (Pesta, J.).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Calix v. Pullen | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Andre Calix | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: T. Pullen | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
