Figueroa v. Quiros et al
| George Figueroa |
| Angel Quiros and Daniel Dougherty |
| 3:2022cv00586 |
| April 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Victor A Bolden |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing fee received from Law Office of Naomi T. Fetterman, LLC: $ 5.00, receipt number 730344. (Mendez, D) |
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 4/25/2022.(Imbriani, Susan)
|
|
Filing 5
Prisoner E-Filing Standing Order on Prisoner Electronic Filing Program Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 4/25/2022.(Imbriani, Susan)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 4/25/2022.(Imbriani, Susan)
|
| Filing 3 PRISCS - MOTION For Stay and Abeyance by George Figueroa.Responses due by 5/16/2022 (Imbriani, Susan) |
| Filing 2 PRISCS- MOTION to Appoint Counsel by George Figueroa. (Imbriani, Susan) |
| Filing 1 PRISCS - PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by George Figueroa. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit) (Imbriani, Susan) |
| Filing fee received from George Figueroa: $ 5, receipt number TBD (Imbriani, Susan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
