Energy Saving Products & Sales Corp. v. FedEx Freight, Inc.
| Energy Saving Products & Sales Corp. doing business as Energy Saving Products |
| FedEx Freight, Inc. |
| 3:2022cv00628 |
| May 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Robert N Chatigny |
| Commerce ICC Rates, Etc. |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Notice of Removal |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Docket Entry Correction re #10 Answer to Amended Complaint. Modified docket text to indicate Jury Demand. (Bozek, M.) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #8 Amended Complaint with Affirmative Defenses and Special Defenses and Jury Demand by FedEx Freight, Inc..(Kratzer, Kevin) Modified docket text on 6/10/2022 to indicate jury demand (Bozek, M.). |
Filing 9
ORDER denying as moot #6 Motion to Dismiss in light of #8 Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 6/7/2022. (Rickevicius, L.)
|
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Energy Saving Products & Sales Corp..(Greene, Gary) |
| Filing 7 Memorandum in Support re #6 MOTION to Dismiss filed by FedEx Freight, Inc.. (Kratzer, Kevin) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss by FedEx Freight, Inc..Responses due by 6/1/2022 (Kratzer, Kevin) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE: Counsel initiating or removing this action is responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #1 Notice of Removal, #4 Standing Protective Order, #2 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, and #3 Electronic Filing Order. Signed by Clerk on 5-6-2022. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order on Removed Cases) (Shafer, J.) |
|
Filing 4
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 5-4-2022. (Shafer, J.)
|
|
Filing 3
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 5-4-2022. (Shafer, J.)
|
|
Filing 2
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: amended pleadings due by 7-3-2022, discovery due by 11-3-2022, and dispositive motions due by 12-8-2022. Signed by Clerk on 5-4-2022. (Shafer, J.)
|
| Judge Robert N. Chatigny added. (Oliver, T.) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by FedEx Freight, Inc. Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACTDC-6922471, filed by FedEx Freight, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 FRCP 7.1 Disclosure)(Kratzer, Kevin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Energy Saving Products & Sales Corp. v. FedEx Freight, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Energy Saving Products & Sales Corp. doing business as Energy Saving Products | |
| Represented By: | Gary Joseph Greene |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: FedEx Freight, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Kevin R. Kratzer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
