Coleman-Mitchell v. Public Health et al
| RENEE COLEMAN-MITCHELL |
| CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH, JOHN DOES, Dept of Public Health and John Doe |
| 3:2022cv00647 |
| May 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Janet C Hall |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Affirmative Defenses and Special Defenses by Dept of Public Health.(Rodriguez, Maria) |
Filing 23
ORDER regarding mediation. Mediation is scheduled for 7/19/22 at 1pm via Zoom videoconference, details for which will be emailed to counsel. Ex parte statements shall be emailed to DFM_SETTLEMENT@CTD.USCOURTS.GOV by 7/12/22. Clients with authority must attend. Participants should plan to spend from 1pm to the end of the day in attendance. SEE ATTACHED FOR FURTHER IMPORTANT INSTRUCTIONS. Signed by Judge Donna F. Martinez on 06/23/2022. (Peterson, M)
|
| Filing 22 NOTICE of Appearance by Carolyn Ennis on behalf of Dept of Public Health (Ennis, Carolyn) |
|
Filing 21
ORDER regarding mediation: This case has been referred to Judge Martinez for mediation. To aid in scheduling, counsel shall agree on three dates when they, and clients with authority to settle, are available. The court will do its best to select from among those dates in scheduling mediation. No dates prior to July are available. Parties must participate. Unless otherwise ordered, the court will hold mediation via Zoom videoconference, beginning at 1pm and continuing throughout the day as needed. Counsel shall email their 3 agreed-upon proposed dates to DFM_SETTLEMENT@ctd.uscourts.gov (with a copy to MARQUITA_PETERSON@ctd.uscourts.gov) by no later than 6/13/2022. Signed by Judge Donna F. Martinez on 6/6/2022. (Peterson, M)
|
|
Filing 20
ORDER withdrawing #14 Motion for Security for Costs; granting #18 Motion to Withdraw #14 MOTION for Security for Costs , #18 MOTION to Withdraw #14 MOTION for Security for Costs . SO ORDERED by Judge Janet C. Hall on 6/3/2022. (Lewis, D)
|
|
Filing 19
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Donna F. Martinez for settlement SO ORDERED by Judge Janet C. Hall on 6/3/2022.(Lewis, D)
|
| Filing 18 MOTION to Withdraw #14 MOTION for Security for Costs by Dept of Public Health. (Rodriguez, Maria) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER granting #15 Motion for Conference. Granted. The case is referred to a magistrate judge. SO ORDERED by Judge Janet C. Hall on 6/2/2022. (Lewis, D)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER granting #13 MOTION for Extension of Time until July 5, 2022 to File a Responsive Pleading. SO ORDERED by Judge Janet C. Hall on 6/1/2022. (Lewis, D)
|
| Filing 15 Joint MOTION for Settlement Conference by Dept of Public Health. (Rodriguez, Maria) |
| Set Deadlines/Hearings: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 7/14/2022 (DeRubeis, B.) |
| Answer deadline updated for Dept of Public Health to 7/5/2022. (Lewis, D) |
| Filing 14 MOTION for Security for Costs by Dept of Public Health. (Rodriguez, Maria) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Extension of Time until July 5, 2022 to File a Responsive Pleading by Dept of Public Health. (Rodriguez, Maria) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Maria C. Rodriguez on behalf of Dept of Public Health (Rodriguez, Maria) |
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Renee Coleman-Mitchell (Miller, Josephine) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/PRO SE LITIGANTS: PLEASE READ AND COMPLY WITH ATTACHED INITIAL DISCOVERY PROTOCOLS WHICH ARE IN EFFECT FOR THIS CASE. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 5/16/2022.(Lewis, D) |
| Filing 9 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Dept of Public Health* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Josephine S. Miller* *152 Deer Hill Avenue, Suite 302* *Danbury, CT 06810*. (Freberg, B) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #1 Complaint filed by Renee Coleman-Mitchell, #6 Order, #5 Protective Order, #7 Notice, #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #2 Notice of Appearance filed by Renee Coleman-Mitchell, #4 Electronic Filing Order Signed by Clerk on 5/12/2022.(Freberg, B) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Josephine S. Miller on behalf of Renee Coleman-Mitchell (Miller, Josephine) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE re Initial Discovery Protocols. Signed by Clerk on 5/9/2022. (Attachments: #1 Discovery Attachment)(Freberg, B) |
|
Filing 6
STANDING ORDER Re Discovery. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 5/9/2022.(Freberg, B)
|
|
Filing 5
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 5/9/2022.(Freberg, B)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 5/9/2022.(Freberg, B)
|
|
Filing 3
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 7/8/2022; Discovery due by 11/8/2022; Dispositive Motions due by 12/13/2022. Signed by Clerk on 5/12/2022.(Freberg, B)
|
| Judge Janet C. Hall added. (Freberg, B) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-6927641.), filed by RENEE COLEMAN-MITCHELL.(Miller, Josephine) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to All Defendants. (Miller, Josephine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
