Santiago v. Warden
| Herb Miller Santiago |
| New Haven CC and Warden |
| 3:2022cv00648 |
| May 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Stefan R Underhill |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. If you change your address at any time during the litigation of this case, Local Rule 83.1(c)2 provides that you notify the court. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 6/10/22. (Corriette, M.)
|
| Filing 7 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Herb Miller Santiago. (Attachments: #1 copy of envelope) (Oliver, T.) |
|
Filing 6
NOTICE OF INSUFFICIENCY. In a complaint dated February 8, 2022, the plaintiff sued several prison officials, substantially alleging that they were responsible for his contracting COVID-19. The Clerk of the Court docketed his complaint under case number 22-cv-00559. The plaintiff also moved for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in that case; in other words, he asked for permission to begin his case without prepaying the $402 filing fee. He failed to submit a complete in forma pauperis application, however, and he also failed to submit a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement as required by the relevant statute, 28 U.S.C. 1915. Accordingly, on April 21, 2022 the Court ordered him to submit a complete application and trust account statement by May 12, 2022.On May 9, 2022, the Court received a second complaint from the same plaintiff, also substantially alleging that prison officials were responsible for his contracting COVID-19. The Clerk of the Court docketed this second complaint under case number 22-cv-00648. It is not clear to the Court that the plaintiff really intended to start a second case. If he did, he must either pay the full filing fee or demonstrate that he is entitled to in forma pauperis status. His in forma pauperis motion in his second case fails to make that demonstration, for the same reasons as in his first case; namely, that he did not fill out the five-page application completely, and he did not attach a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement.If the plaintiff wishes to pursue this second case, he is ordered to file (a) a complete Prisoner Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis in a Civil Rights Action, including page five; and (b) a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement for the period November 2, 2021 to May 2, 2022. He must make this filing by June 2, 2022. If he does not do so, his case may be dismissed. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 5/12/2022.(Corriette, M.)
|
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 5/9/2022.(Chartier, AnnMarie)
|
|
Filing 4
PRISONER E-FILING STANDING ORDER Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 5/9/2022.(Chartier, AnnMarie)
|
|
Filing 3
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 5/9/2022.(Chartier, AnnMarie)
|
| Filing 2 PRISCS MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Herb Miller Santiago. (Chartier, AnnMarie) |
| Filing 1 PRISCS COMPLAINT against New Haven CC, filed by Herb Miller Santiago. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Chartier, AnnMarie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
