Robinson v. Caine & Weiner
| Azumah Robinson |
| Caine & Weiner |
| 3:2022cv00657 |
| May 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Stefan R Underhill |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Settlement by Azumah Robinson (Oliver, T.) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Azumah Robinson. Caine & Weiner served on 6/6/2022, answer due 6/27/2022. (Oliver, T.) |
| Filing 9 AMENDED NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #2 Consent to Electronic Notice filed by Azumah Robinson, #1 Complaint filed by Azumah Robinson, #8 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #4 Electronic Filing Order, #5 Protective Order Signed by Clerk on 5/13/2022.(Chartier, AnnMarie) |
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Caine & Weiner* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. *Azumah Robinson* *85 Pond Street* *New Haven, CT 06511*. (Chartier, AnnMarie) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #2 Consent to Electronic Notice filed by Azumah Robinson, #1 Complaint filed by Azumah Robinson, #3 Pretrial Order, #4 Electronic Filing Order, #5 Protective Order Signed by Clerk on 5/12/2022.(Chartier, AnnMarie) |
Filing 5
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 5/11/2022.(Chartier, AnnMarie)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 5/11/2022.(Chartier, AnnMarie)
|
| Filing 3 PRETRIAL ORDER Signed by Clerk on 5/11/2022.(Chartier, AnnMarie) |
| Filing 2 Consent to Electronic Notice by Azumah Robinson (Chartier, AnnMarie) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Caine & Weiner, filed by Azumah Robinson. (Attachments: #(1) Exhibit A, #(2) Exhibit B, #(3) Civil Cover Sheet(Chartier, AnnMarie) |
| Filing fee received from Azumah Robinson: $ 402.00, receipt number 783205 (Chartier, AnnMarie) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Caine & Weiner. (Chartier, AnnMarie) Modified on 5/12/2022 to correct file date (Chartier, AnnMarie). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Robinson v. Caine & Weiner | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Azumah Robinson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Caine & Weiner | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
