Via v. Warden
| Allan Ray Via |
| Respondent and Warden |
| 3:2022cv00727 |
| June 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Kari A Dooley |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE by Allan Ray Via. (Attachment #1 Exhibit A Re: STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER) (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 4
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. See attached. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 6/10/2022. (Banker, Joshua)
|
| Docket Entry Correction re Filing Fee Received MODIFIED TO ADD RECEIPT # 12984 TO THE DOCKET ENTRY (Oliver, T.) |
|
Filing 3
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 6/3/2022. (Fanelle, N.) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/3/2022: #1 Replacement pdf.) (Fanelle, N.).
|
|
Filing 2
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 6/3/2022. (Fanelle, N.)
|
| Filing 1 PRISCS PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Allan Ray Via. (Fanelle, N.) |
| Filing fee received from Allan Ray Via:$ 5.00, receipt number 12984. (Fanelle, N.) Modified on 6/7/2022 (Oliver, T.). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
