Daley v. Home Depot USA Inc et al
Sherwin D. Daley |
Home Depot USA Inc, Home Depot Management Company, LLC, Home Depot Products Authority, LLC, New Home Depot Products Authority, LLC and HD Supply, Inc. |
3:2022cv00737 |
June 2, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Janet C Hall |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 SCHEDULING ORDER REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN: Discovery due by 6/1/2023; Dispositive Motions due by 2/1/2023; Joint Status Reports due by 10/21/2022; Joint Trial Memorandum due by 6/1/2023. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 7/21/2022.(Freberg, B) |
Filing 14 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Smith, Kaitlin) |
Filing 13 ORDER granting #12 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Sherwin D. Daley SO ORDERED by Judge Janet C. Hall on 6/22/2022.(Lewis, D) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal of Certain Defendants by Sherwin D. Daley (Brennan, Brigid) |
Filing 11 RESPONSE by Home Depot USA IncStatement of Compliance with Standing Order. (Smith, Kaitlin) |
Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Home Depot USA Inc. (Smith, Kaitlin) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand by Home Depot USA Inc.(Smith, Kaitlin) |
Set Deadlines/Hearings: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 7/20/2022 (Lewis, D) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Brigid Connolly Brennan on behalf of Sherwin D. Daley (Brennan, Brigid) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #4 Electronic Filing Order, #2 Notice of Appearance filed by Home Depot USA Inc, 3 Notice 83.1,, #6 Protective Order, #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Home Depot USA Inc, #5 Order on Pretrial Deadlines Signed by Clerk on 6/2/2022.(Freberg, B) |
Filing 6 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 6/2/2022.(Freberg, B) |
Filing 5 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 8/1/2022; Discovery due by 12/2/2022; Dispositive Motions due by 1/6/2023. Signed by Clerk on 6/2/2022.(Freberg, B) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 6/2/2022.(Freberg, B) |
Filing 3 NOTICE TO COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO THE BAR OF THE US DISTRICT COURT OF CONNECTICUT Re: Local Rule 83.1 Admission of Attorneys. The above captioned case has been received and filed in our court. Please see our Local Rule 83.1 regarding Admission of Attorneys that is available on our website at www.ctd.uscourts.gov. You will not be added to the case, nor will we accept further filings until you have complied with Local Rule 83.1. If you have any questions about this procedure, please contact the Clerk's Office. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 6/3/2022.(Lewis, D) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Kaitlin Kelly Smith on behalf of Home Depot USA Inc (Smith, Kaitlin) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. from Judicial District of New Haven at New Haven, case number NNH-CV22-6123222-S. Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACTDC-6953627, filed by Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Civil Action Cover Sheet)(Smith, Kaitlin) |
Judge Janet C. Hall added. (Freberg, B) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.